Spherical Capacitor
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
A spherical capacitor consists of two concentric conducting shells with charges pm Q and radius r_i inner shell and r_o outer shell respectively. abcliste abc Show that there is no electric field on the inside of the inner shell r r_i. abc Derive an expression for the electric field between the two shells r_i r r_o. abc Show that there is no electric field outside the outer shell r r_o. abcliste
Solution:
In each case the symmetry of the field radial field lines implies that a concentric shell is an appropriate Gaussian surface. Asing the electric field at distance r from the centre is Er the electric flux is Phi_E Er Ar pi Er r^ abcliste abc There is no charge inside the inner shell so for r r_i Gauss's law yields Phi_E pi Er r^ fracsscQenclosedvarepsilon_ It follows that Er for r r_i. abc The charge enclosed by a Gaussian surface with r_i r r_o is the charge on the inner shell i.e. Q. Using Gauss's law Phi_E pi Er r^ fracsscQenclosedvarepsilon_ fracQvarepsilon_ it follows Er fracQpivarepsilon_ r^ abc For a closed surface containing both shells the enclosed charge is zero. Using Gauss's law Phi_E pi Er r^ fracsscQenclosedvarepsilon_ which yields Er for r r_o. abcliste The figure below displays the electric as a function of r. center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:spherical-capacitor-# center
A spherical capacitor consists of two concentric conducting shells with charges pm Q and radius r_i inner shell and r_o outer shell respectively. abcliste abc Show that there is no electric field on the inside of the inner shell r r_i. abc Derive an expression for the electric field between the two shells r_i r r_o. abc Show that there is no electric field outside the outer shell r r_o. abcliste
Solution:
In each case the symmetry of the field radial field lines implies that a concentric shell is an appropriate Gaussian surface. Asing the electric field at distance r from the centre is Er the electric flux is Phi_E Er Ar pi Er r^ abcliste abc There is no charge inside the inner shell so for r r_i Gauss's law yields Phi_E pi Er r^ fracsscQenclosedvarepsilon_ It follows that Er for r r_i. abc The charge enclosed by a Gaussian surface with r_i r r_o is the charge on the inner shell i.e. Q. Using Gauss's law Phi_E pi Er r^ fracsscQenclosedvarepsilon_ fracQvarepsilon_ it follows Er fracQpivarepsilon_ r^ abc For a closed surface containing both shells the enclosed charge is zero. Using Gauss's law Phi_E pi Er r^ fracsscQenclosedvarepsilon_ which yields Er for r r_o. abcliste The figure below displays the electric as a function of r. center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:spherical-capacitor-# center
Meta Information
Exercise:
A spherical capacitor consists of two concentric conducting shells with charges pm Q and radius r_i inner shell and r_o outer shell respectively. abcliste abc Show that there is no electric field on the inside of the inner shell r r_i. abc Derive an expression for the electric field between the two shells r_i r r_o. abc Show that there is no electric field outside the outer shell r r_o. abcliste
Solution:
In each case the symmetry of the field radial field lines implies that a concentric shell is an appropriate Gaussian surface. Asing the electric field at distance r from the centre is Er the electric flux is Phi_E Er Ar pi Er r^ abcliste abc There is no charge inside the inner shell so for r r_i Gauss's law yields Phi_E pi Er r^ fracsscQenclosedvarepsilon_ It follows that Er for r r_i. abc The charge enclosed by a Gaussian surface with r_i r r_o is the charge on the inner shell i.e. Q. Using Gauss's law Phi_E pi Er r^ fracsscQenclosedvarepsilon_ fracQvarepsilon_ it follows Er fracQpivarepsilon_ r^ abc For a closed surface containing both shells the enclosed charge is zero. Using Gauss's law Phi_E pi Er r^ fracsscQenclosedvarepsilon_ which yields Er for r r_o. abcliste The figure below displays the electric as a function of r. center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:spherical-capacitor-# center
A spherical capacitor consists of two concentric conducting shells with charges pm Q and radius r_i inner shell and r_o outer shell respectively. abcliste abc Show that there is no electric field on the inside of the inner shell r r_i. abc Derive an expression for the electric field between the two shells r_i r r_o. abc Show that there is no electric field outside the outer shell r r_o. abcliste
Solution:
In each case the symmetry of the field radial field lines implies that a concentric shell is an appropriate Gaussian surface. Asing the electric field at distance r from the centre is Er the electric flux is Phi_E Er Ar pi Er r^ abcliste abc There is no charge inside the inner shell so for r r_i Gauss's law yields Phi_E pi Er r^ fracsscQenclosedvarepsilon_ It follows that Er for r r_i. abc The charge enclosed by a Gaussian surface with r_i r r_o is the charge on the inner shell i.e. Q. Using Gauss's law Phi_E pi Er r^ fracsscQenclosedvarepsilon_ fracQvarepsilon_ it follows Er fracQpivarepsilon_ r^ abc For a closed surface containing both shells the enclosed charge is zero. Using Gauss's law Phi_E pi Er r^ fracsscQenclosedvarepsilon_ which yields Er for r r_o. abcliste The figure below displays the electric as a function of r. center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:spherical-capacitor-# center
Contained in these collections:
-
Gauss's Law by by

