Alternating n-linear function
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Let ngeq and D an n--linear function which is alternating. Let leq jleq n. Define a function E_j:M_ntimes nKlongrightarrow K by E_jA:_i^n -^i+jA_ijD_ijA. Then E_j is an n-linear function and it is alternating. If D is a determinant function then so is E_j.
Solution:
Let Ain M_ntimes nK. Clearly D_ijA is indepent of the ith row of A. Since D is n--linear the map Amapsto D_ijA is linear when viewed as a function of each of its rows except row #i. As a function of row #i this function is constant and not necessarily so in general not linear. Longrightarrow The function Amapsto A_ij D_ijA is n-linear. Now linear combination of n-linear functions are n-linear hence E_jA_i^n -^i+jA_ijD_ijA is n-linear too. We'll show now that E_j is alternating. By a previous proposition it is enough to show that E_jA whenever A has two equal adjacent rows. So write A pmatrix hdots & alpha_ & hdots hdots & vdots & hdots hdots & alpha_n & hdots pmatrix and ase that alpha_kalpha_k+ for some leq kleq n-. Let leq ileq n s.t. ineq k and ineq k+. The matrix Ai|j has two equal rows hence D_ijA because D_ijADAi|j and D is ased to be alternating. Longrightarrow E_jA-^k+jA_kjD_kjA+-^k++jA_k+jD_k+jA. textBut alpha_kalpha_k+Longrightarrow A_kjA_k+jA Longrightarrow E_jA This proves that E_j is n-linear and alternating. Finally ase that D is a determinant function i.e. it has the additional property that DI_n-. Note that I_nj|jI_n- forall j. So E_jI_n_i^n -^i+jI_n_ij D_ijI_n -^j+jD_jjI_nDI_nj|jDI_n-. This shows that E_j is a determinant function.
Let ngeq and D an n--linear function which is alternating. Let leq jleq n. Define a function E_j:M_ntimes nKlongrightarrow K by E_jA:_i^n -^i+jA_ijD_ijA. Then E_j is an n-linear function and it is alternating. If D is a determinant function then so is E_j.
Solution:
Let Ain M_ntimes nK. Clearly D_ijA is indepent of the ith row of A. Since D is n--linear the map Amapsto D_ijA is linear when viewed as a function of each of its rows except row #i. As a function of row #i this function is constant and not necessarily so in general not linear. Longrightarrow The function Amapsto A_ij D_ijA is n-linear. Now linear combination of n-linear functions are n-linear hence E_jA_i^n -^i+jA_ijD_ijA is n-linear too. We'll show now that E_j is alternating. By a previous proposition it is enough to show that E_jA whenever A has two equal adjacent rows. So write A pmatrix hdots & alpha_ & hdots hdots & vdots & hdots hdots & alpha_n & hdots pmatrix and ase that alpha_kalpha_k+ for some leq kleq n-. Let leq ileq n s.t. ineq k and ineq k+. The matrix Ai|j has two equal rows hence D_ijA because D_ijADAi|j and D is ased to be alternating. Longrightarrow E_jA-^k+jA_kjD_kjA+-^k++jA_k+jD_k+jA. textBut alpha_kalpha_k+Longrightarrow A_kjA_k+jA Longrightarrow E_jA This proves that E_j is n-linear and alternating. Finally ase that D is a determinant function i.e. it has the additional property that DI_n-. Note that I_nj|jI_n- forall j. So E_jI_n_i^n -^i+jI_n_ij D_ijI_n -^j+jD_jjI_nDI_nj|jDI_n-. This shows that E_j is a determinant function.
Meta Information
Exercise:
Let ngeq and D an n--linear function which is alternating. Let leq jleq n. Define a function E_j:M_ntimes nKlongrightarrow K by E_jA:_i^n -^i+jA_ijD_ijA. Then E_j is an n-linear function and it is alternating. If D is a determinant function then so is E_j.
Solution:
Let Ain M_ntimes nK. Clearly D_ijA is indepent of the ith row of A. Since D is n--linear the map Amapsto D_ijA is linear when viewed as a function of each of its rows except row #i. As a function of row #i this function is constant and not necessarily so in general not linear. Longrightarrow The function Amapsto A_ij D_ijA is n-linear. Now linear combination of n-linear functions are n-linear hence E_jA_i^n -^i+jA_ijD_ijA is n-linear too. We'll show now that E_j is alternating. By a previous proposition it is enough to show that E_jA whenever A has two equal adjacent rows. So write A pmatrix hdots & alpha_ & hdots hdots & vdots & hdots hdots & alpha_n & hdots pmatrix and ase that alpha_kalpha_k+ for some leq kleq n-. Let leq ileq n s.t. ineq k and ineq k+. The matrix Ai|j has two equal rows hence D_ijA because D_ijADAi|j and D is ased to be alternating. Longrightarrow E_jA-^k+jA_kjD_kjA+-^k++jA_k+jD_k+jA. textBut alpha_kalpha_k+Longrightarrow A_kjA_k+jA Longrightarrow E_jA This proves that E_j is n-linear and alternating. Finally ase that D is a determinant function i.e. it has the additional property that DI_n-. Note that I_nj|jI_n- forall j. So E_jI_n_i^n -^i+jI_n_ij D_ijI_n -^j+jD_jjI_nDI_nj|jDI_n-. This shows that E_j is a determinant function.
Let ngeq and D an n--linear function which is alternating. Let leq jleq n. Define a function E_j:M_ntimes nKlongrightarrow K by E_jA:_i^n -^i+jA_ijD_ijA. Then E_j is an n-linear function and it is alternating. If D is a determinant function then so is E_j.
Solution:
Let Ain M_ntimes nK. Clearly D_ijA is indepent of the ith row of A. Since D is n--linear the map Amapsto D_ijA is linear when viewed as a function of each of its rows except row #i. As a function of row #i this function is constant and not necessarily so in general not linear. Longrightarrow The function Amapsto A_ij D_ijA is n-linear. Now linear combination of n-linear functions are n-linear hence E_jA_i^n -^i+jA_ijD_ijA is n-linear too. We'll show now that E_j is alternating. By a previous proposition it is enough to show that E_jA whenever A has two equal adjacent rows. So write A pmatrix hdots & alpha_ & hdots hdots & vdots & hdots hdots & alpha_n & hdots pmatrix and ase that alpha_kalpha_k+ for some leq kleq n-. Let leq ileq n s.t. ineq k and ineq k+. The matrix Ai|j has two equal rows hence D_ijA because D_ijADAi|j and D is ased to be alternating. Longrightarrow E_jA-^k+jA_kjD_kjA+-^k++jA_k+jD_k+jA. textBut alpha_kalpha_k+Longrightarrow A_kjA_k+jA Longrightarrow E_jA This proves that E_j is n-linear and alternating. Finally ase that D is a determinant function i.e. it has the additional property that DI_n-. Note that I_nj|jI_n- forall j. So E_jI_n_i^n -^i+jI_n_ij D_ijI_n -^j+jD_jjI_nDI_nj|jDI_n-. This shows that E_j is a determinant function.
Contained in these collections: