Basis, row-rank, Gauss
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Let B in M_mtimes n be a matrix which is in reduced row echelon form. Then the rows of B that are not totally form a basis for Row SB. In particular row-rankB equals the number of non-zero rows in B number of pivots in B.Also the pivot columns of B form a basis for Col SB. In particular for matrices B that are in reduced row echelon form we have row-rankBcol-rankB.
Solution:
Proof. Denote by j_ ... j_r the column numbers of the pivots. Denote by u_...u_r the non-zero rows of B. We'll first show that u_...u_r are lineary indepent. Indeed ase that _i^r lambda_i u_i this is a vector in K^n for some lambda_...lambda_r in K. The entry number j_k in this vector above is precisely lambda_k because in col#j_k we have everything except a in entry k that comes from the vector u_k. Since _i^r lambda_i u_i we obtain that lambda_k. This holds forall leq k leq r Longrightarrow u_...u_rr are lineary indepent. But Row SB Spu_...u_r Longrightarrow u_...u_r are a basis for Row SB. We now turn to Col SB. Clearly textColSBsubseteq leftleftarrayc x_ . . . x_m arrayright in K^m | x_r+...x_mright K^rtimes ^m-r. At the same time the pivot columns of B are of the form: e_leftarrayc . . arrayright e_leftarrayc . . arrayright e_rleftarrayc . . arrayright So e_...e_r make a basis for K^rtimes ^m-r. Longrightarrow K^rtimes ^m-r Spe_...e_rsubseteq Col SB subseteq K^rtimes ^m-r. We have equality everywhere hence e_...e_r form a basis for Col SB.
Let B in M_mtimes n be a matrix which is in reduced row echelon form. Then the rows of B that are not totally form a basis for Row SB. In particular row-rankB equals the number of non-zero rows in B number of pivots in B.Also the pivot columns of B form a basis for Col SB. In particular for matrices B that are in reduced row echelon form we have row-rankBcol-rankB.
Solution:
Proof. Denote by j_ ... j_r the column numbers of the pivots. Denote by u_...u_r the non-zero rows of B. We'll first show that u_...u_r are lineary indepent. Indeed ase that _i^r lambda_i u_i this is a vector in K^n for some lambda_...lambda_r in K. The entry number j_k in this vector above is precisely lambda_k because in col#j_k we have everything except a in entry k that comes from the vector u_k. Since _i^r lambda_i u_i we obtain that lambda_k. This holds forall leq k leq r Longrightarrow u_...u_rr are lineary indepent. But Row SB Spu_...u_r Longrightarrow u_...u_r are a basis for Row SB. We now turn to Col SB. Clearly textColSBsubseteq leftleftarrayc x_ . . . x_m arrayright in K^m | x_r+...x_mright K^rtimes ^m-r. At the same time the pivot columns of B are of the form: e_leftarrayc . . arrayright e_leftarrayc . . arrayright e_rleftarrayc . . arrayright So e_...e_r make a basis for K^rtimes ^m-r. Longrightarrow K^rtimes ^m-r Spe_...e_rsubseteq Col SB subseteq K^rtimes ^m-r. We have equality everywhere hence e_...e_r form a basis for Col SB.
Meta Information
Exercise:
Let B in M_mtimes n be a matrix which is in reduced row echelon form. Then the rows of B that are not totally form a basis for Row SB. In particular row-rankB equals the number of non-zero rows in B number of pivots in B.Also the pivot columns of B form a basis for Col SB. In particular for matrices B that are in reduced row echelon form we have row-rankBcol-rankB.
Solution:
Proof. Denote by j_ ... j_r the column numbers of the pivots. Denote by u_...u_r the non-zero rows of B. We'll first show that u_...u_r are lineary indepent. Indeed ase that _i^r lambda_i u_i this is a vector in K^n for some lambda_...lambda_r in K. The entry number j_k in this vector above is precisely lambda_k because in col#j_k we have everything except a in entry k that comes from the vector u_k. Since _i^r lambda_i u_i we obtain that lambda_k. This holds forall leq k leq r Longrightarrow u_...u_rr are lineary indepent. But Row SB Spu_...u_r Longrightarrow u_...u_r are a basis for Row SB. We now turn to Col SB. Clearly textColSBsubseteq leftleftarrayc x_ . . . x_m arrayright in K^m | x_r+...x_mright K^rtimes ^m-r. At the same time the pivot columns of B are of the form: e_leftarrayc . . arrayright e_leftarrayc . . arrayright e_rleftarrayc . . arrayright So e_...e_r make a basis for K^rtimes ^m-r. Longrightarrow K^rtimes ^m-r Spe_...e_rsubseteq Col SB subseteq K^rtimes ^m-r. We have equality everywhere hence e_...e_r form a basis for Col SB.
Let B in M_mtimes n be a matrix which is in reduced row echelon form. Then the rows of B that are not totally form a basis for Row SB. In particular row-rankB equals the number of non-zero rows in B number of pivots in B.Also the pivot columns of B form a basis for Col SB. In particular for matrices B that are in reduced row echelon form we have row-rankBcol-rankB.
Solution:
Proof. Denote by j_ ... j_r the column numbers of the pivots. Denote by u_...u_r the non-zero rows of B. We'll first show that u_...u_r are lineary indepent. Indeed ase that _i^r lambda_i u_i this is a vector in K^n for some lambda_...lambda_r in K. The entry number j_k in this vector above is precisely lambda_k because in col#j_k we have everything except a in entry k that comes from the vector u_k. Since _i^r lambda_i u_i we obtain that lambda_k. This holds forall leq k leq r Longrightarrow u_...u_rr are lineary indepent. But Row SB Spu_...u_r Longrightarrow u_...u_r are a basis for Row SB. We now turn to Col SB. Clearly textColSBsubseteq leftleftarrayc x_ . . . x_m arrayright in K^m | x_r+...x_mright K^rtimes ^m-r. At the same time the pivot columns of B are of the form: e_leftarrayc . . arrayright e_leftarrayc . . arrayright e_rleftarrayc . . arrayright So e_...e_r make a basis for K^rtimes ^m-r. Longrightarrow K^rtimes ^m-r Spe_...e_rsubseteq Col SB subseteq K^rtimes ^m-r. We have equality everywhere hence e_...e_r form a basis for Col SB.
Contained in these collections: