TeXercises.com

Energie eines Satelliten

About points...

We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.

That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.

About difficulty...

We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.

That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:

Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise

Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise

Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise

Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise

Level 5 -
Level 6 -

Exercise

Physics Mechanics Gravitation

Physics Mechanics Work, Energy, Power

https://texercises.com/exercise/energie-eines-satelliten-1/

Question

Solution

Short

Video

\(\LaTeX\)

No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.

Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!

Exercise:
Ein Satellit bewege sich auf einer Kreisbahn von vorgegebenem Radius um die Erde. Wie gross sind seine kinetische und potentielle Energie und welche Beziehung besteht zwischen den beiden Energien?

Solution:
Die Resultate für diese Energiebeziehungen werden üblicherweise mit der Gravitationskonstante auf der Erdoberfläche ausgedrückt also mit g_ fracGMEarthrEarth^ . Für die kinetische Energie erhält man dann Ekin fracmv^ fracm fracGMEarthr fracm fracgr rEarth^ fracmg_ rEarth^r Dabei wurde die Geschwindigkeit über die Bedingung dass die Zentripetal- gleich der Gravitationskraft sein muss berechnet. Die potentielle Energie ist über das Arbeitsegral definiert. Setzt man die Normierungskonstante üblicherweise so dass auf der Erdoberfläche Nullniveau herrscht gleich Null dann erhält man Epot -fracmg_ rEarth^r . Die Beziehung zwischen den beiden Energien kann dann einfach gefunden werden Ekin -fracEpot .

Report An Error

Description: Reporter: Email:

You are on texercises.com.
reCaptcha will only work on our main-domain \(\TeX\)ercises.com!

Meta Information

\(\LaTeX\)-Code

Contained in these collections:

Attributes & Decorations

Branches	Gravitation, Work, Energy, Power
Tags	energie, gravitation, kinetische energie, kreisbahn, physik, potentielle energie, satellit
Content image
Difficulty	(2, default)
Points	3 (default)
Language	(Deutsch)
Type	Algebraic
Decoration