Fallgesetze: Schiefer Wurf 17
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Zeichnen Sie v_y als Funktion von v_x für einen vollständigen schiefen Wurf ygeqslant .
Solution:
% . November Lie. * &v_x v_x v_ cosalpha_ textconst &v_y v_y - gt v_sinalpha_ - gt quad rightarrow quad v_y in left -v_y; +v_y right * minipage.textwidth captlabelfig:VyVsVxWurf Der Graph von v_yv_x für einen schiefen Wurf ist eine vertikale Strecke die um die v_x-Achse zentriert ist. newline technisch gesehen also keine Funktion sondern eine Relation minipage hfill minipage.textwidth centering includegraphicsGrafiken/VyVsVxWurf/VyVsVxWurf.pdf % . November Lie. minipage newpage figureH includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:VyVsVxWurf# caption labelfig:VyVsVxWurf figure
Zeichnen Sie v_y als Funktion von v_x für einen vollständigen schiefen Wurf ygeqslant .
Solution:
% . November Lie. * &v_x v_x v_ cosalpha_ textconst &v_y v_y - gt v_sinalpha_ - gt quad rightarrow quad v_y in left -v_y; +v_y right * minipage.textwidth captlabelfig:VyVsVxWurf Der Graph von v_yv_x für einen schiefen Wurf ist eine vertikale Strecke die um die v_x-Achse zentriert ist. newline technisch gesehen also keine Funktion sondern eine Relation minipage hfill minipage.textwidth centering includegraphicsGrafiken/VyVsVxWurf/VyVsVxWurf.pdf % . November Lie. minipage newpage figureH includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:VyVsVxWurf# caption labelfig:VyVsVxWurf figure
Meta Information
Exercise:
Zeichnen Sie v_y als Funktion von v_x für einen vollständigen schiefen Wurf ygeqslant .
Solution:
% . November Lie. * &v_x v_x v_ cosalpha_ textconst &v_y v_y - gt v_sinalpha_ - gt quad rightarrow quad v_y in left -v_y; +v_y right * minipage.textwidth captlabelfig:VyVsVxWurf Der Graph von v_yv_x für einen schiefen Wurf ist eine vertikale Strecke die um die v_x-Achse zentriert ist. newline technisch gesehen also keine Funktion sondern eine Relation minipage hfill minipage.textwidth centering includegraphicsGrafiken/VyVsVxWurf/VyVsVxWurf.pdf % . November Lie. minipage newpage figureH includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:VyVsVxWurf# caption labelfig:VyVsVxWurf figure
Zeichnen Sie v_y als Funktion von v_x für einen vollständigen schiefen Wurf ygeqslant .
Solution:
% . November Lie. * &v_x v_x v_ cosalpha_ textconst &v_y v_y - gt v_sinalpha_ - gt quad rightarrow quad v_y in left -v_y; +v_y right * minipage.textwidth captlabelfig:VyVsVxWurf Der Graph von v_yv_x für einen schiefen Wurf ist eine vertikale Strecke die um die v_x-Achse zentriert ist. newline technisch gesehen also keine Funktion sondern eine Relation minipage hfill minipage.textwidth centering includegraphicsGrafiken/VyVsVxWurf/VyVsVxWurf.pdf % . November Lie. minipage newpage figureH includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:VyVsVxWurf# caption labelfig:VyVsVxWurf figure
Contained in these collections:
-
Fallgesetze: Schiefer Wurf by Lie