Fonte de glace avec un radiateur thermique
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
Need help? Yes, please!
The following quantities appear in the problem:
Zeit \(t\) / Masse \(m\) / Arbeit \(W\) / Energie \(E\) / Leistung \(P, \Phi\) / Volumen \(V\) / Wärme \(Q\) / Höhe \(h\) / spezifische latente Wärme \(L\) / Radius \(r\) / Dichte \(\varrho\) /
The following formulas must be used to solve the exercise:
\(\varrho = \dfrac{m}{V} \quad \) \(Q = m \cdot L_{\scriptscriptstyle\rm f} \quad \) \(Q = m \cdot L_{\scriptscriptstyle\rm v} \quad \) \(P = \dfrac{E}{t} = \dfrac{W}{t} = \dfrac{Q}{t} \quad \) \(V = \pi r^2 \cdot h \quad \)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Combien de te faudrait-il pour liquéfier mO de glace à son po de fusion à l’aide d’un radiateur thermique de puissance PO?
Solution:
Geg m mO m P PO P GesZeitdauertsim Um das Eis zu schmelzen sind Q mL_f m L Q Wärme nötig. Mit dem Heizstrahler kann diese innert t fracQP fracEP fracmL_fP fracQP t approx thP übertragen werden. t fracmL_fP tS thP
Combien de te faudrait-il pour liquéfier mO de glace à son po de fusion à l’aide d’un radiateur thermique de puissance PO?
Solution:
Geg m mO m P PO P GesZeitdauertsim Um das Eis zu schmelzen sind Q mL_f m L Q Wärme nötig. Mit dem Heizstrahler kann diese innert t fracQP fracEP fracmL_fP fracQP t approx thP übertragen werden. t fracmL_fP tS thP
Meta Information
Exercise:
Combien de te faudrait-il pour liquéfier mO de glace à son po de fusion à l’aide d’un radiateur thermique de puissance PO?
Solution:
Geg m mO m P PO P GesZeitdauertsim Um das Eis zu schmelzen sind Q mL_f m L Q Wärme nötig. Mit dem Heizstrahler kann diese innert t fracQP fracEP fracmL_fP fracQP t approx thP übertragen werden. t fracmL_fP tS thP
Combien de te faudrait-il pour liquéfier mO de glace à son po de fusion à l’aide d’un radiateur thermique de puissance PO?
Solution:
Geg m mO m P PO P GesZeitdauertsim Um das Eis zu schmelzen sind Q mL_f m L Q Wärme nötig. Mit dem Heizstrahler kann diese innert t fracQP fracEP fracmL_fP fracQP t approx thP übertragen werden. t fracmL_fP tS thP
Contained in these collections
-
Latente Wärme 1 by uz
-
Latente Wärme und Leistung by TeXercises
| Title | Matched on |
|---|---|
| Eis schmelzen mit Wärmestrahler | tagsformula |
| Eis schmelzen mit Wärmestrahler | tagsformula |
| Aletschgletscher schmelzen | tagsformula |
| Kosten um Eisen zu schmelzen | formula |
| Mit Brennholz Eisen schmelzen | formula |
Similar exercises (10)
| Title | Matched on |
|---|---|
| Eis schmelzen mit Wärmestrahler | tagsformula |
| Eis schmelzen mit Wärmestrahler | tagsformula |
| Aletschgletscher schmelzen | tagsformula |
| Kosten um Eisen zu schmelzen | formula |
| Mit Brennholz Eisen schmelzen | formula |
| Zartbitterschokolade schmelzen | formula |
| Gold schmelzen | formula |
| Kupfer mit Buchenholz schmelzen | formula |
| Heizwert von Stoff | formula |
| Bergsteigen | tags |