Hochspannungsleitung
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Muss bei der Konstruktion einer Hochspannungsleitung der Einfluss des Erdmagnetfelds Horizontalkomponente microtesla berücksichtigt werden? Die Frage ist zu beantworten indem die Biot-Savart-Kraft auf eine von maximal A durchflossenen Hochspannungsleitung zwischen zwei m voneinander entfernten Masten im ungünstigsten Fall berechnest.
Solution:
newqtyBtesla newqtyIA newqtylm solqtyFI ell BIn*ln*BnN Die Biot-Savart-Kraft wird betragsmässig am grössten wenn die Richtung der magnetischen Flussdichte rechtwinklig zur Richtung des stromführen Drahtes steht. Da die Feldlinien vom geographischen Süden zum Norden verlaufen wäre die Hochspannungsleitung in diesem Fall von Osten nach Westen gerichtet. Im ungünstigsten Fall beträgt die Kraft also al F Ff I l B FTT. Das entspricht etwa Gewichtskraft eines Snickers das heisst der Einfluss kann gut vernachlässigt werden.
Muss bei der Konstruktion einer Hochspannungsleitung der Einfluss des Erdmagnetfelds Horizontalkomponente microtesla berücksichtigt werden? Die Frage ist zu beantworten indem die Biot-Savart-Kraft auf eine von maximal A durchflossenen Hochspannungsleitung zwischen zwei m voneinander entfernten Masten im ungünstigsten Fall berechnest.
Solution:
newqtyBtesla newqtyIA newqtylm solqtyFI ell BIn*ln*BnN Die Biot-Savart-Kraft wird betragsmässig am grössten wenn die Richtung der magnetischen Flussdichte rechtwinklig zur Richtung des stromführen Drahtes steht. Da die Feldlinien vom geographischen Süden zum Norden verlaufen wäre die Hochspannungsleitung in diesem Fall von Osten nach Westen gerichtet. Im ungünstigsten Fall beträgt die Kraft also al F Ff I l B FTT. Das entspricht etwa Gewichtskraft eines Snickers das heisst der Einfluss kann gut vernachlässigt werden.
Meta Information
Exercise:
Muss bei der Konstruktion einer Hochspannungsleitung der Einfluss des Erdmagnetfelds Horizontalkomponente microtesla berücksichtigt werden? Die Frage ist zu beantworten indem die Biot-Savart-Kraft auf eine von maximal A durchflossenen Hochspannungsleitung zwischen zwei m voneinander entfernten Masten im ungünstigsten Fall berechnest.
Solution:
newqtyBtesla newqtyIA newqtylm solqtyFI ell BIn*ln*BnN Die Biot-Savart-Kraft wird betragsmässig am grössten wenn die Richtung der magnetischen Flussdichte rechtwinklig zur Richtung des stromführen Drahtes steht. Da die Feldlinien vom geographischen Süden zum Norden verlaufen wäre die Hochspannungsleitung in diesem Fall von Osten nach Westen gerichtet. Im ungünstigsten Fall beträgt die Kraft also al F Ff I l B FTT. Das entspricht etwa Gewichtskraft eines Snickers das heisst der Einfluss kann gut vernachlässigt werden.
Muss bei der Konstruktion einer Hochspannungsleitung der Einfluss des Erdmagnetfelds Horizontalkomponente microtesla berücksichtigt werden? Die Frage ist zu beantworten indem die Biot-Savart-Kraft auf eine von maximal A durchflossenen Hochspannungsleitung zwischen zwei m voneinander entfernten Masten im ungünstigsten Fall berechnest.
Solution:
newqtyBtesla newqtyIA newqtylm solqtyFI ell BIn*ln*BnN Die Biot-Savart-Kraft wird betragsmässig am grössten wenn die Richtung der magnetischen Flussdichte rechtwinklig zur Richtung des stromführen Drahtes steht. Da die Feldlinien vom geographischen Süden zum Norden verlaufen wäre die Hochspannungsleitung in diesem Fall von Osten nach Westen gerichtet. Im ungünstigsten Fall beträgt die Kraft also al F Ff I l B FTT. Das entspricht etwa Gewichtskraft eines Snickers das heisst der Einfluss kann gut vernachlässigt werden.
Contained in these collections:
-
Lorentzkraft auf Leiter by uz
-
Biot-Savart-Kraft by pw