Newton's Second Law and Relativistic Dynamics
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Newton's second law in the form vec F fractextrmdvec ptextrmdt dotvec p is still correct in relativistic physics. abcliste abc Show that when the force acting on a particle is parallel to its velocity it can be written as F gamma^ m dot v gamma^ m a abc Show that the general relation between the force vector and the accelerations parallel and perpicular to the motion of the particle is vec F gamma^ m vec a_parallel + gamma m vec a_perp abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The relativistic momentum is p gamma m v The derivative with respect to time is dot p mleftdotgamma v+gammadot vright The derivative of the Lorentz factor with respect to time is fractextrmdgammatextrmdt fractextrmdgammatextrmdv fractextrmdvtextrmdt fractextrmdtextrmdvleft-leftfracvcright^right^-/ dot v -fra vleft-leftfracvcright^right^-/left-fracvc^right fracv dot vc^ gamma^ Putting everything together we find dot p gamma m dot v leftgamma^fracv^c^+right gamma m dot v leftfracfracv^c^-fracv^c^+right gamma m dot v leftfracv^c^-v^+right gamma m dot v left fracv^+c^-v^c^-v^right gamma m dot v left frac-fracv^c^right gamma m dot v gamma^ gamma^ m dot v gamma^ m a abc The derivative of the momentum vector with respect to time is dot vec p mleftfractextrmdgammatextrmdt vec v + gamma fractextrmdvec vtextrmdtright The derivative of the Lorentz factor can be derived in a similar way as before but we have to take o account that v^ v_x^+v_y^+v_z^ so according to the chain rule we have the following expression: dot gamma fractextrmdgammatextrmdv_x dot v_x + fractextrmdgammatextrmdv_y dot v_y + fractextrmdgammatextrmdv_z dot v_z With fractextrmdgammatextrmdv_x fractextrmdtextrmdv_xleft-fracv_x^+v_y^+v_z^c^right^-/ frac-left-fracv_x^+v_y^+v_z^c^right^-/ leftfrac- v_xc^right fracv_xc^ gamma^ and the anologous expressions for the derivative with respect to v_y and v_z we find for dot gamma dot gamma gamma^ fracv_x dot v_x+v_y dot v_y + v_z dot v_zc^ fracgamma^c^ vec v dotvec v It follows for the derivative of the momentum vector dotvec p m leftfracgamma^c^vec v dotvec vvec v + gamma dotvec v right gamma m leftfracgamma^c^ vec v vec a vec v+vec aright We can express the acceleration as the e of the accelerations parallel and perpicular to the motion: vec a vec a_parallel + vec a_perp Since vec v perp vec a_perp we have vec v vec a vec v vec a_parallel + vec a_perp vec v vec a_parallel and since vec v and a_parallel are parallel the vector vec v vec a_parallel vec v has the same direction as a_parallel and magnitude v^ a_parallel so it can be written as vec v vec a_parallel vec v v^ vec a_parallel The force vector is thus vec F dotvec p gamma m leftgamma^fracv^c^ vec a_parallel + a_parallel + a_perpright gamma m leftgamma^ fracv^c^+right vec a_parallel + gamma m vec a_perp gamma^ m vec a_parallel + gamma m vec a_perp The result shows that the ratio between force and mass is not the same for forces acting parallel and perpicular to the motion of the particle. abcliste
Newton's second law in the form vec F fractextrmdvec ptextrmdt dotvec p is still correct in relativistic physics. abcliste abc Show that when the force acting on a particle is parallel to its velocity it can be written as F gamma^ m dot v gamma^ m a abc Show that the general relation between the force vector and the accelerations parallel and perpicular to the motion of the particle is vec F gamma^ m vec a_parallel + gamma m vec a_perp abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The relativistic momentum is p gamma m v The derivative with respect to time is dot p mleftdotgamma v+gammadot vright The derivative of the Lorentz factor with respect to time is fractextrmdgammatextrmdt fractextrmdgammatextrmdv fractextrmdvtextrmdt fractextrmdtextrmdvleft-leftfracvcright^right^-/ dot v -fra vleft-leftfracvcright^right^-/left-fracvc^right fracv dot vc^ gamma^ Putting everything together we find dot p gamma m dot v leftgamma^fracv^c^+right gamma m dot v leftfracfracv^c^-fracv^c^+right gamma m dot v leftfracv^c^-v^+right gamma m dot v left fracv^+c^-v^c^-v^right gamma m dot v left frac-fracv^c^right gamma m dot v gamma^ gamma^ m dot v gamma^ m a abc The derivative of the momentum vector with respect to time is dot vec p mleftfractextrmdgammatextrmdt vec v + gamma fractextrmdvec vtextrmdtright The derivative of the Lorentz factor can be derived in a similar way as before but we have to take o account that v^ v_x^+v_y^+v_z^ so according to the chain rule we have the following expression: dot gamma fractextrmdgammatextrmdv_x dot v_x + fractextrmdgammatextrmdv_y dot v_y + fractextrmdgammatextrmdv_z dot v_z With fractextrmdgammatextrmdv_x fractextrmdtextrmdv_xleft-fracv_x^+v_y^+v_z^c^right^-/ frac-left-fracv_x^+v_y^+v_z^c^right^-/ leftfrac- v_xc^right fracv_xc^ gamma^ and the anologous expressions for the derivative with respect to v_y and v_z we find for dot gamma dot gamma gamma^ fracv_x dot v_x+v_y dot v_y + v_z dot v_zc^ fracgamma^c^ vec v dotvec v It follows for the derivative of the momentum vector dotvec p m leftfracgamma^c^vec v dotvec vvec v + gamma dotvec v right gamma m leftfracgamma^c^ vec v vec a vec v+vec aright We can express the acceleration as the e of the accelerations parallel and perpicular to the motion: vec a vec a_parallel + vec a_perp Since vec v perp vec a_perp we have vec v vec a vec v vec a_parallel + vec a_perp vec v vec a_parallel and since vec v and a_parallel are parallel the vector vec v vec a_parallel vec v has the same direction as a_parallel and magnitude v^ a_parallel so it can be written as vec v vec a_parallel vec v v^ vec a_parallel The force vector is thus vec F dotvec p gamma m leftgamma^fracv^c^ vec a_parallel + a_parallel + a_perpright gamma m leftgamma^ fracv^c^+right vec a_parallel + gamma m vec a_perp gamma^ m vec a_parallel + gamma m vec a_perp The result shows that the ratio between force and mass is not the same for forces acting parallel and perpicular to the motion of the particle. abcliste
Meta Information
Exercise:
Newton's second law in the form vec F fractextrmdvec ptextrmdt dotvec p is still correct in relativistic physics. abcliste abc Show that when the force acting on a particle is parallel to its velocity it can be written as F gamma^ m dot v gamma^ m a abc Show that the general relation between the force vector and the accelerations parallel and perpicular to the motion of the particle is vec F gamma^ m vec a_parallel + gamma m vec a_perp abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The relativistic momentum is p gamma m v The derivative with respect to time is dot p mleftdotgamma v+gammadot vright The derivative of the Lorentz factor with respect to time is fractextrmdgammatextrmdt fractextrmdgammatextrmdv fractextrmdvtextrmdt fractextrmdtextrmdvleft-leftfracvcright^right^-/ dot v -fra vleft-leftfracvcright^right^-/left-fracvc^right fracv dot vc^ gamma^ Putting everything together we find dot p gamma m dot v leftgamma^fracv^c^+right gamma m dot v leftfracfracv^c^-fracv^c^+right gamma m dot v leftfracv^c^-v^+right gamma m dot v left fracv^+c^-v^c^-v^right gamma m dot v left frac-fracv^c^right gamma m dot v gamma^ gamma^ m dot v gamma^ m a abc The derivative of the momentum vector with respect to time is dot vec p mleftfractextrmdgammatextrmdt vec v + gamma fractextrmdvec vtextrmdtright The derivative of the Lorentz factor can be derived in a similar way as before but we have to take o account that v^ v_x^+v_y^+v_z^ so according to the chain rule we have the following expression: dot gamma fractextrmdgammatextrmdv_x dot v_x + fractextrmdgammatextrmdv_y dot v_y + fractextrmdgammatextrmdv_z dot v_z With fractextrmdgammatextrmdv_x fractextrmdtextrmdv_xleft-fracv_x^+v_y^+v_z^c^right^-/ frac-left-fracv_x^+v_y^+v_z^c^right^-/ leftfrac- v_xc^right fracv_xc^ gamma^ and the anologous expressions for the derivative with respect to v_y and v_z we find for dot gamma dot gamma gamma^ fracv_x dot v_x+v_y dot v_y + v_z dot v_zc^ fracgamma^c^ vec v dotvec v It follows for the derivative of the momentum vector dotvec p m leftfracgamma^c^vec v dotvec vvec v + gamma dotvec v right gamma m leftfracgamma^c^ vec v vec a vec v+vec aright We can express the acceleration as the e of the accelerations parallel and perpicular to the motion: vec a vec a_parallel + vec a_perp Since vec v perp vec a_perp we have vec v vec a vec v vec a_parallel + vec a_perp vec v vec a_parallel and since vec v and a_parallel are parallel the vector vec v vec a_parallel vec v has the same direction as a_parallel and magnitude v^ a_parallel so it can be written as vec v vec a_parallel vec v v^ vec a_parallel The force vector is thus vec F dotvec p gamma m leftgamma^fracv^c^ vec a_parallel + a_parallel + a_perpright gamma m leftgamma^ fracv^c^+right vec a_parallel + gamma m vec a_perp gamma^ m vec a_parallel + gamma m vec a_perp The result shows that the ratio between force and mass is not the same for forces acting parallel and perpicular to the motion of the particle. abcliste
Newton's second law in the form vec F fractextrmdvec ptextrmdt dotvec p is still correct in relativistic physics. abcliste abc Show that when the force acting on a particle is parallel to its velocity it can be written as F gamma^ m dot v gamma^ m a abc Show that the general relation between the force vector and the accelerations parallel and perpicular to the motion of the particle is vec F gamma^ m vec a_parallel + gamma m vec a_perp abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The relativistic momentum is p gamma m v The derivative with respect to time is dot p mleftdotgamma v+gammadot vright The derivative of the Lorentz factor with respect to time is fractextrmdgammatextrmdt fractextrmdgammatextrmdv fractextrmdvtextrmdt fractextrmdtextrmdvleft-leftfracvcright^right^-/ dot v -fra vleft-leftfracvcright^right^-/left-fracvc^right fracv dot vc^ gamma^ Putting everything together we find dot p gamma m dot v leftgamma^fracv^c^+right gamma m dot v leftfracfracv^c^-fracv^c^+right gamma m dot v leftfracv^c^-v^+right gamma m dot v left fracv^+c^-v^c^-v^right gamma m dot v left frac-fracv^c^right gamma m dot v gamma^ gamma^ m dot v gamma^ m a abc The derivative of the momentum vector with respect to time is dot vec p mleftfractextrmdgammatextrmdt vec v + gamma fractextrmdvec vtextrmdtright The derivative of the Lorentz factor can be derived in a similar way as before but we have to take o account that v^ v_x^+v_y^+v_z^ so according to the chain rule we have the following expression: dot gamma fractextrmdgammatextrmdv_x dot v_x + fractextrmdgammatextrmdv_y dot v_y + fractextrmdgammatextrmdv_z dot v_z With fractextrmdgammatextrmdv_x fractextrmdtextrmdv_xleft-fracv_x^+v_y^+v_z^c^right^-/ frac-left-fracv_x^+v_y^+v_z^c^right^-/ leftfrac- v_xc^right fracv_xc^ gamma^ and the anologous expressions for the derivative with respect to v_y and v_z we find for dot gamma dot gamma gamma^ fracv_x dot v_x+v_y dot v_y + v_z dot v_zc^ fracgamma^c^ vec v dotvec v It follows for the derivative of the momentum vector dotvec p m leftfracgamma^c^vec v dotvec vvec v + gamma dotvec v right gamma m leftfracgamma^c^ vec v vec a vec v+vec aright We can express the acceleration as the e of the accelerations parallel and perpicular to the motion: vec a vec a_parallel + vec a_perp Since vec v perp vec a_perp we have vec v vec a vec v vec a_parallel + vec a_perp vec v vec a_parallel and since vec v and a_parallel are parallel the vector vec v vec a_parallel vec v has the same direction as a_parallel and magnitude v^ a_parallel so it can be written as vec v vec a_parallel vec v v^ vec a_parallel The force vector is thus vec F dotvec p gamma m leftgamma^fracv^c^ vec a_parallel + a_parallel + a_perpright gamma m leftgamma^ fracv^c^+right vec a_parallel + gamma m vec a_perp gamma^ m vec a_parallel + gamma m vec a_perp The result shows that the ratio between force and mass is not the same for forces acting parallel and perpicular to the motion of the particle. abcliste
Contained in these collections:
-
Relativistic Dynamics by by