Orthonormal wave functions
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Show that the wave functions for the eigenstates of the infinite potential well psi_nx t sqrtfracL sink_n x are orthonormal i.e. they fulfil the relation _^L psi^*_mxtpsi_nxttextrmdx delta_mn where delta_mn is the Kronecker symbol: delta_mn cases & textrmif mn & textrmelse cases
Solution:
We first consider the case mn. _^L|psi_nxt|^textrmdx fracL _^Lsin^k_n x textrmdx fracL fracL where we have used the identity sin^alpha frac left-cos alpharight to evaluate the egral _^L sin^k_n x textrmdx _^L frac left - cosk_n xright textrmdx fracL - frack_nleftsink_n xright_^L fracL - frack_nleft-right fracL In the last step we have used that sin k_n L sinleft fracnpiL L right sin n pi For the case mneq n we have to evaluate the egral I_mn _^L psi_nxt psi_m^*xt textrmdx fracL _^L sink_n x sink_m x textrmdx With the identity sinalpha sinbeta frac leftcosalpha-beta - cosalpha+betaright this can be written as I_mn fracL _^L leftcosleftk_n-k_m xright - cosleftk_n+k_m xright right textrmdx fracL leftfrack_n-k_m sinleftk_n-k_m xright - frack_n+k_m sinleftk_n+k_m xright right_^L At x and xL all sine terms vanish e.g. sinleftk_n-k_m Lright sinleftn-mpiright This leads to the expected result: I_mn
Show that the wave functions for the eigenstates of the infinite potential well psi_nx t sqrtfracL sink_n x are orthonormal i.e. they fulfil the relation _^L psi^*_mxtpsi_nxttextrmdx delta_mn where delta_mn is the Kronecker symbol: delta_mn cases & textrmif mn & textrmelse cases
Solution:
We first consider the case mn. _^L|psi_nxt|^textrmdx fracL _^Lsin^k_n x textrmdx fracL fracL where we have used the identity sin^alpha frac left-cos alpharight to evaluate the egral _^L sin^k_n x textrmdx _^L frac left - cosk_n xright textrmdx fracL - frack_nleftsink_n xright_^L fracL - frack_nleft-right fracL In the last step we have used that sin k_n L sinleft fracnpiL L right sin n pi For the case mneq n we have to evaluate the egral I_mn _^L psi_nxt psi_m^*xt textrmdx fracL _^L sink_n x sink_m x textrmdx With the identity sinalpha sinbeta frac leftcosalpha-beta - cosalpha+betaright this can be written as I_mn fracL _^L leftcosleftk_n-k_m xright - cosleftk_n+k_m xright right textrmdx fracL leftfrack_n-k_m sinleftk_n-k_m xright - frack_n+k_m sinleftk_n+k_m xright right_^L At x and xL all sine terms vanish e.g. sinleftk_n-k_m Lright sinleftn-mpiright This leads to the expected result: I_mn
Meta Information
Exercise:
Show that the wave functions for the eigenstates of the infinite potential well psi_nx t sqrtfracL sink_n x are orthonormal i.e. they fulfil the relation _^L psi^*_mxtpsi_nxttextrmdx delta_mn where delta_mn is the Kronecker symbol: delta_mn cases & textrmif mn & textrmelse cases
Solution:
We first consider the case mn. _^L|psi_nxt|^textrmdx fracL _^Lsin^k_n x textrmdx fracL fracL where we have used the identity sin^alpha frac left-cos alpharight to evaluate the egral _^L sin^k_n x textrmdx _^L frac left - cosk_n xright textrmdx fracL - frack_nleftsink_n xright_^L fracL - frack_nleft-right fracL In the last step we have used that sin k_n L sinleft fracnpiL L right sin n pi For the case mneq n we have to evaluate the egral I_mn _^L psi_nxt psi_m^*xt textrmdx fracL _^L sink_n x sink_m x textrmdx With the identity sinalpha sinbeta frac leftcosalpha-beta - cosalpha+betaright this can be written as I_mn fracL _^L leftcosleftk_n-k_m xright - cosleftk_n+k_m xright right textrmdx fracL leftfrack_n-k_m sinleftk_n-k_m xright - frack_n+k_m sinleftk_n+k_m xright right_^L At x and xL all sine terms vanish e.g. sinleftk_n-k_m Lright sinleftn-mpiright This leads to the expected result: I_mn
Show that the wave functions for the eigenstates of the infinite potential well psi_nx t sqrtfracL sink_n x are orthonormal i.e. they fulfil the relation _^L psi^*_mxtpsi_nxttextrmdx delta_mn where delta_mn is the Kronecker symbol: delta_mn cases & textrmif mn & textrmelse cases
Solution:
We first consider the case mn. _^L|psi_nxt|^textrmdx fracL _^Lsin^k_n x textrmdx fracL fracL where we have used the identity sin^alpha frac left-cos alpharight to evaluate the egral _^L sin^k_n x textrmdx _^L frac left - cosk_n xright textrmdx fracL - frack_nleftsink_n xright_^L fracL - frack_nleft-right fracL In the last step we have used that sin k_n L sinleft fracnpiL L right sin n pi For the case mneq n we have to evaluate the egral I_mn _^L psi_nxt psi_m^*xt textrmdx fracL _^L sink_n x sink_m x textrmdx With the identity sinalpha sinbeta frac leftcosalpha-beta - cosalpha+betaright this can be written as I_mn fracL _^L leftcosleftk_n-k_m xright - cosleftk_n+k_m xright right textrmdx fracL leftfrack_n-k_m sinleftk_n-k_m xright - frack_n+k_m sinleftk_n+k_m xright right_^L At x and xL all sine terms vanish e.g. sinleftk_n-k_m Lright sinleftn-mpiright This leads to the expected result: I_mn
Contained in these collections:

