Staumauer der Grande Dixence
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
Jérémy Toma, , 2019, digital photograph, Wikipedia
<Wikipedia> (retrieved on November 28, 2022)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Die Staumauer der Grande Dixence VS ist m hoch. Der Stausee ist .km lang maximal m tief und hat ein Volumen von Millionensicubicmeter. abcliste abc Wie hoch ist der Staudruck . km weiter unten im Kraftwerk? abc Wie viel Energie könnte bei vollkommener Entleerung des Sees maximal gewonnen werden? Geben Sie das Resultat in Joule und kWh an. abc Wie nennt man das Faktum dass die Grösse des Sees für den Druck keine Rolle spielt? abcliste
Solution:
% . April Lie * &texta p rho gh sikg/m^ .sim/s^ .eeesim uulinesibar &textb E_p mgh rho V g h sikg/m^ eeesim^ .sim/s^ .eeesim^ &qquad uuline.eeesiJ div .eeesifracJkWh uuline.eeesikWh &textc hydrostatisches Paradoxon * Es ist nicht ganz klar von wo aus die .sikm gemessen werden. Die zweite Ziffer der Resultate ist deshalb unsicher. newpage
Die Staumauer der Grande Dixence VS ist m hoch. Der Stausee ist .km lang maximal m tief und hat ein Volumen von Millionensicubicmeter. abcliste abc Wie hoch ist der Staudruck . km weiter unten im Kraftwerk? abc Wie viel Energie könnte bei vollkommener Entleerung des Sees maximal gewonnen werden? Geben Sie das Resultat in Joule und kWh an. abc Wie nennt man das Faktum dass die Grösse des Sees für den Druck keine Rolle spielt? abcliste
Solution:
% . April Lie * &texta p rho gh sikg/m^ .sim/s^ .eeesim uulinesibar &textb E_p mgh rho V g h sikg/m^ eeesim^ .sim/s^ .eeesim^ &qquad uuline.eeesiJ div .eeesifracJkWh uuline.eeesikWh &textc hydrostatisches Paradoxon * Es ist nicht ganz klar von wo aus die .sikm gemessen werden. Die zweite Ziffer der Resultate ist deshalb unsicher. newpage
Meta Information
Exercise:
Die Staumauer der Grande Dixence VS ist m hoch. Der Stausee ist .km lang maximal m tief und hat ein Volumen von Millionensicubicmeter. abcliste abc Wie hoch ist der Staudruck . km weiter unten im Kraftwerk? abc Wie viel Energie könnte bei vollkommener Entleerung des Sees maximal gewonnen werden? Geben Sie das Resultat in Joule und kWh an. abc Wie nennt man das Faktum dass die Grösse des Sees für den Druck keine Rolle spielt? abcliste
Solution:
% . April Lie * &texta p rho gh sikg/m^ .sim/s^ .eeesim uulinesibar &textb E_p mgh rho V g h sikg/m^ eeesim^ .sim/s^ .eeesim^ &qquad uuline.eeesiJ div .eeesifracJkWh uuline.eeesikWh &textc hydrostatisches Paradoxon * Es ist nicht ganz klar von wo aus die .sikm gemessen werden. Die zweite Ziffer der Resultate ist deshalb unsicher. newpage
Die Staumauer der Grande Dixence VS ist m hoch. Der Stausee ist .km lang maximal m tief und hat ein Volumen von Millionensicubicmeter. abcliste abc Wie hoch ist der Staudruck . km weiter unten im Kraftwerk? abc Wie viel Energie könnte bei vollkommener Entleerung des Sees maximal gewonnen werden? Geben Sie das Resultat in Joule und kWh an. abc Wie nennt man das Faktum dass die Grösse des Sees für den Druck keine Rolle spielt? abcliste
Solution:
% . April Lie * &texta p rho gh sikg/m^ .sim/s^ .eeesim uulinesibar &textb E_p mgh rho V g h sikg/m^ eeesim^ .sim/s^ .eeesim^ &qquad uuline.eeesiJ div .eeesifracJkWh uuline.eeesikWh &textc hydrostatisches Paradoxon * Es ist nicht ganz klar von wo aus die .sikm gemessen werden. Die zweite Ziffer der Resultate ist deshalb unsicher. newpage
Contained in these collections:
-
Hydrostatik: Schweredruck by Lie