Subspaces and dimensions
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Let V be a finite dimensional vector space over K. Then every subspace mathcalU subseteq V is also finite dimensional. Moreover dim mathcalU leq dimV with equality iff mathcalUV.
Solution:
Proof. Denote n:dimV. Let mathcalU subseteq V be a subspace. We'll first show that mathcalU has a finite basis. If mathcalU then varnothing is the basis of mathcalU and we are done. So ase now mathcalUneq. Take v_ in mathcalU backslash. If mathcalU Spv_ we get a basis for mathcalU. If mathcalUneq Spv_ then take v_in mathcalUbackslash Spv_. By Lemma E v_v_ are linearly indepent. We continue this process and after j steps we obtain a list v_...v_j in mathcalU that is linearly indepent. If Spv_...v_jmathcalU we are done. Otherwise we choose v_j+in mathcalUbackslash Spv_...v_j. Again by Lemma E v_...v_jv_j+ are linearly indepent. However in V a list of linearly indepent vectors can have length n at most Longrightarrow The procedure described above must after not more than n steps say kleq n steps. And we obtain a list v_...v_k in mathcalU kleq n of linearly indepent vectors s.t. Spv_...v_kmathcalU. By definition v_...v_k is a basis for mathcalU Longrightarrow dim mathcalUkleq ndimV. Now if mathcalUV then clearly dim mathcalUdimV. Conversely suppose dim mathcalUdimV Longrightarrow kn. The list of vectors v_...v_nin mathcalU is a basis for mathcalU hence are linearly indepent also when considered in V. By the theorem shown before v_...v_n form a basis for V Longrightarrow mathcalUSpv_...v_nV.
Let V be a finite dimensional vector space over K. Then every subspace mathcalU subseteq V is also finite dimensional. Moreover dim mathcalU leq dimV with equality iff mathcalUV.
Solution:
Proof. Denote n:dimV. Let mathcalU subseteq V be a subspace. We'll first show that mathcalU has a finite basis. If mathcalU then varnothing is the basis of mathcalU and we are done. So ase now mathcalUneq. Take v_ in mathcalU backslash. If mathcalU Spv_ we get a basis for mathcalU. If mathcalUneq Spv_ then take v_in mathcalUbackslash Spv_. By Lemma E v_v_ are linearly indepent. We continue this process and after j steps we obtain a list v_...v_j in mathcalU that is linearly indepent. If Spv_...v_jmathcalU we are done. Otherwise we choose v_j+in mathcalUbackslash Spv_...v_j. Again by Lemma E v_...v_jv_j+ are linearly indepent. However in V a list of linearly indepent vectors can have length n at most Longrightarrow The procedure described above must after not more than n steps say kleq n steps. And we obtain a list v_...v_k in mathcalU kleq n of linearly indepent vectors s.t. Spv_...v_kmathcalU. By definition v_...v_k is a basis for mathcalU Longrightarrow dim mathcalUkleq ndimV. Now if mathcalUV then clearly dim mathcalUdimV. Conversely suppose dim mathcalUdimV Longrightarrow kn. The list of vectors v_...v_nin mathcalU is a basis for mathcalU hence are linearly indepent also when considered in V. By the theorem shown before v_...v_n form a basis for V Longrightarrow mathcalUSpv_...v_nV.
Meta Information
Exercise:
Let V be a finite dimensional vector space over K. Then every subspace mathcalU subseteq V is also finite dimensional. Moreover dim mathcalU leq dimV with equality iff mathcalUV.
Solution:
Proof. Denote n:dimV. Let mathcalU subseteq V be a subspace. We'll first show that mathcalU has a finite basis. If mathcalU then varnothing is the basis of mathcalU and we are done. So ase now mathcalUneq. Take v_ in mathcalU backslash. If mathcalU Spv_ we get a basis for mathcalU. If mathcalUneq Spv_ then take v_in mathcalUbackslash Spv_. By Lemma E v_v_ are linearly indepent. We continue this process and after j steps we obtain a list v_...v_j in mathcalU that is linearly indepent. If Spv_...v_jmathcalU we are done. Otherwise we choose v_j+in mathcalUbackslash Spv_...v_j. Again by Lemma E v_...v_jv_j+ are linearly indepent. However in V a list of linearly indepent vectors can have length n at most Longrightarrow The procedure described above must after not more than n steps say kleq n steps. And we obtain a list v_...v_k in mathcalU kleq n of linearly indepent vectors s.t. Spv_...v_kmathcalU. By definition v_...v_k is a basis for mathcalU Longrightarrow dim mathcalUkleq ndimV. Now if mathcalUV then clearly dim mathcalUdimV. Conversely suppose dim mathcalUdimV Longrightarrow kn. The list of vectors v_...v_nin mathcalU is a basis for mathcalU hence are linearly indepent also when considered in V. By the theorem shown before v_...v_n form a basis for V Longrightarrow mathcalUSpv_...v_nV.
Let V be a finite dimensional vector space over K. Then every subspace mathcalU subseteq V is also finite dimensional. Moreover dim mathcalU leq dimV with equality iff mathcalUV.
Solution:
Proof. Denote n:dimV. Let mathcalU subseteq V be a subspace. We'll first show that mathcalU has a finite basis. If mathcalU then varnothing is the basis of mathcalU and we are done. So ase now mathcalUneq. Take v_ in mathcalU backslash. If mathcalU Spv_ we get a basis for mathcalU. If mathcalUneq Spv_ then take v_in mathcalUbackslash Spv_. By Lemma E v_v_ are linearly indepent. We continue this process and after j steps we obtain a list v_...v_j in mathcalU that is linearly indepent. If Spv_...v_jmathcalU we are done. Otherwise we choose v_j+in mathcalUbackslash Spv_...v_j. Again by Lemma E v_...v_jv_j+ are linearly indepent. However in V a list of linearly indepent vectors can have length n at most Longrightarrow The procedure described above must after not more than n steps say kleq n steps. And we obtain a list v_...v_k in mathcalU kleq n of linearly indepent vectors s.t. Spv_...v_kmathcalU. By definition v_...v_k is a basis for mathcalU Longrightarrow dim mathcalUkleq ndimV. Now if mathcalUV then clearly dim mathcalUdimV. Conversely suppose dim mathcalUdimV Longrightarrow kn. The list of vectors v_...v_nin mathcalU is a basis for mathcalU hence are linearly indepent also when considered in V. By the theorem shown before v_...v_n form a basis for V Longrightarrow mathcalUSpv_...v_nV.
Contained in these collections: