Three-Mass System
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Derive the system of differential s for the system of three coupled masses in the figure below. Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors for K k and describe the normal modes in words. center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:thremass-system-# center
Solution:
The differential s are mddot x_ -K x_+kx_-x_ -K+k x_+k x_ mddot x_ kx_-x_+kx_-x_ k x_-k x_ +k x_ mddot x_ kx_-x_ -K x_k x_-K+kx_ The coefficient matrix is thus A pmatrix -fracK+km & frackm & frackm & -frackm & frackm & frackm & -fracK+km pmatrix The characteristic polynomial is given by detleftbf A-lambda bf Iright detpmatrix -fracK+km-lambda & frackm & frackm & -frackm-lambda & frackm & frackm & -fracK+km-lambda pmatrix -leftfracK+km+lambdaright^leftfrackm+lambdaright+leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftfrackmright^ leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftleftfrackmright^-leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftfrackm+lambdarightright leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftfrack^m^-frack^m^-fracKkm^-fracK+kmlambda-frackmlambda-lambda^right -leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftlambda^+fracK+kmlambda+fracKkm^right with zeros for lambda_ -fracK+km lambda_ fracleft-fracK+kmpmsqrtleftfracK+kmright^-fracKkm^right fracmleft-K+kpmsqrtK^+Kk+k^-Kkright frac-K+kpmsqrtK^-Kk+k^m For Kk this can be simplified: lambda_ -frackm -omega_^ lambda_ frac-k-sqrtk^m-+sqrtomega_^ lambda_ frac-k+sqrtk^m--sqrtomega_^ with omega_^ frackm The three normal modes have angular frequencies omega_ sqrtomega_ omega_ sqrt+sqrtomega_ omega_ sqrt-sqrtomega_ with omega_omega_omega_. vspacemm It can easily be verified that the corresponding eigenvectors can be written as hat x_ pmatrix - pmatrix hat x_ pmatrix -sqrt pmatrix hat x_ pmatrix sqrt pmatrix The three normal modes can be characterised as follows: itemize item All three masses moving in sync with the amplitude of the middle mass being sqrt greater than that of the masses on the sides lowest frequency omega_. item Left and right masses moving in opposite directions with the middle mass at rest ermediate frequency omega_. item Left and right mass moving in sync with the middle mass moving in opposite direction with amplitude sqrt greater than that of the other masses highest frequency omega_. itemize
Derive the system of differential s for the system of three coupled masses in the figure below. Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors for K k and describe the normal modes in words. center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:thremass-system-# center
Solution:
The differential s are mddot x_ -K x_+kx_-x_ -K+k x_+k x_ mddot x_ kx_-x_+kx_-x_ k x_-k x_ +k x_ mddot x_ kx_-x_ -K x_k x_-K+kx_ The coefficient matrix is thus A pmatrix -fracK+km & frackm & frackm & -frackm & frackm & frackm & -fracK+km pmatrix The characteristic polynomial is given by detleftbf A-lambda bf Iright detpmatrix -fracK+km-lambda & frackm & frackm & -frackm-lambda & frackm & frackm & -fracK+km-lambda pmatrix -leftfracK+km+lambdaright^leftfrackm+lambdaright+leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftfrackmright^ leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftleftfrackmright^-leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftfrackm+lambdarightright leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftfrack^m^-frack^m^-fracKkm^-fracK+kmlambda-frackmlambda-lambda^right -leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftlambda^+fracK+kmlambda+fracKkm^right with zeros for lambda_ -fracK+km lambda_ fracleft-fracK+kmpmsqrtleftfracK+kmright^-fracKkm^right fracmleft-K+kpmsqrtK^+Kk+k^-Kkright frac-K+kpmsqrtK^-Kk+k^m For Kk this can be simplified: lambda_ -frackm -omega_^ lambda_ frac-k-sqrtk^m-+sqrtomega_^ lambda_ frac-k+sqrtk^m--sqrtomega_^ with omega_^ frackm The three normal modes have angular frequencies omega_ sqrtomega_ omega_ sqrt+sqrtomega_ omega_ sqrt-sqrtomega_ with omega_omega_omega_. vspacemm It can easily be verified that the corresponding eigenvectors can be written as hat x_ pmatrix - pmatrix hat x_ pmatrix -sqrt pmatrix hat x_ pmatrix sqrt pmatrix The three normal modes can be characterised as follows: itemize item All three masses moving in sync with the amplitude of the middle mass being sqrt greater than that of the masses on the sides lowest frequency omega_. item Left and right masses moving in opposite directions with the middle mass at rest ermediate frequency omega_. item Left and right mass moving in sync with the middle mass moving in opposite direction with amplitude sqrt greater than that of the other masses highest frequency omega_. itemize
Meta Information
Exercise:
Derive the system of differential s for the system of three coupled masses in the figure below. Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors for K k and describe the normal modes in words. center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:thremass-system-# center
Solution:
The differential s are mddot x_ -K x_+kx_-x_ -K+k x_+k x_ mddot x_ kx_-x_+kx_-x_ k x_-k x_ +k x_ mddot x_ kx_-x_ -K x_k x_-K+kx_ The coefficient matrix is thus A pmatrix -fracK+km & frackm & frackm & -frackm & frackm & frackm & -fracK+km pmatrix The characteristic polynomial is given by detleftbf A-lambda bf Iright detpmatrix -fracK+km-lambda & frackm & frackm & -frackm-lambda & frackm & frackm & -fracK+km-lambda pmatrix -leftfracK+km+lambdaright^leftfrackm+lambdaright+leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftfrackmright^ leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftleftfrackmright^-leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftfrackm+lambdarightright leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftfrack^m^-frack^m^-fracKkm^-fracK+kmlambda-frackmlambda-lambda^right -leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftlambda^+fracK+kmlambda+fracKkm^right with zeros for lambda_ -fracK+km lambda_ fracleft-fracK+kmpmsqrtleftfracK+kmright^-fracKkm^right fracmleft-K+kpmsqrtK^+Kk+k^-Kkright frac-K+kpmsqrtK^-Kk+k^m For Kk this can be simplified: lambda_ -frackm -omega_^ lambda_ frac-k-sqrtk^m-+sqrtomega_^ lambda_ frac-k+sqrtk^m--sqrtomega_^ with omega_^ frackm The three normal modes have angular frequencies omega_ sqrtomega_ omega_ sqrt+sqrtomega_ omega_ sqrt-sqrtomega_ with omega_omega_omega_. vspacemm It can easily be verified that the corresponding eigenvectors can be written as hat x_ pmatrix - pmatrix hat x_ pmatrix -sqrt pmatrix hat x_ pmatrix sqrt pmatrix The three normal modes can be characterised as follows: itemize item All three masses moving in sync with the amplitude of the middle mass being sqrt greater than that of the masses on the sides lowest frequency omega_. item Left and right masses moving in opposite directions with the middle mass at rest ermediate frequency omega_. item Left and right mass moving in sync with the middle mass moving in opposite direction with amplitude sqrt greater than that of the other masses highest frequency omega_. itemize
Derive the system of differential s for the system of three coupled masses in the figure below. Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors for K k and describe the normal modes in words. center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:thremass-system-# center
Solution:
The differential s are mddot x_ -K x_+kx_-x_ -K+k x_+k x_ mddot x_ kx_-x_+kx_-x_ k x_-k x_ +k x_ mddot x_ kx_-x_ -K x_k x_-K+kx_ The coefficient matrix is thus A pmatrix -fracK+km & frackm & frackm & -frackm & frackm & frackm & -fracK+km pmatrix The characteristic polynomial is given by detleftbf A-lambda bf Iright detpmatrix -fracK+km-lambda & frackm & frackm & -frackm-lambda & frackm & frackm & -fracK+km-lambda pmatrix -leftfracK+km+lambdaright^leftfrackm+lambdaright+leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftfrackmright^ leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftleftfrackmright^-leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftfrackm+lambdarightright leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftfrack^m^-frack^m^-fracKkm^-fracK+kmlambda-frackmlambda-lambda^right -leftfracK+km+lambdarightleftlambda^+fracK+kmlambda+fracKkm^right with zeros for lambda_ -fracK+km lambda_ fracleft-fracK+kmpmsqrtleftfracK+kmright^-fracKkm^right fracmleft-K+kpmsqrtK^+Kk+k^-Kkright frac-K+kpmsqrtK^-Kk+k^m For Kk this can be simplified: lambda_ -frackm -omega_^ lambda_ frac-k-sqrtk^m-+sqrtomega_^ lambda_ frac-k+sqrtk^m--sqrtomega_^ with omega_^ frackm The three normal modes have angular frequencies omega_ sqrtomega_ omega_ sqrt+sqrtomega_ omega_ sqrt-sqrtomega_ with omega_omega_omega_. vspacemm It can easily be verified that the corresponding eigenvectors can be written as hat x_ pmatrix - pmatrix hat x_ pmatrix -sqrt pmatrix hat x_ pmatrix sqrt pmatrix The three normal modes can be characterised as follows: itemize item All three masses moving in sync with the amplitude of the middle mass being sqrt greater than that of the masses on the sides lowest frequency omega_. item Left and right masses moving in opposite directions with the middle mass at rest ermediate frequency omega_. item Left and right mass moving in sync with the middle mass moving in opposite direction with amplitude sqrt greater than that of the other masses highest frequency omega_. itemize
Contained in these collections:
-
Coupled Oscillators by by

