Vokal sprechen mit Helium
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
Need help? Yes, please!
The following quantities appear in the problem:
Länge \(\ell\) / Geschwindigkeit \(v\) / Frequenz \(f\) / Wellenlänge \(\lambda\) /
The following formulas must be used to solve the exercise:
\(\ell = \frac{\lambda}{4} \cdot (2k-1) \quad \) \(c = \lambda \cdot f \quad \)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Eine Person atmet Helium ein und spricht ein Vokal mit einer dominanten Resonanzfrequenz von cfO. Die Luftsäule im Vokaltrakt kann näherungsweise als zylindrische Röhre mit einer Länge von clO modelliert werden die am einen Ende durch die Stimmlippen geschlossen ist und am anderen Ende offen also wie eine gedackte Pfeife. Berechne die Schallgeschwindigkeit des Helium-Luft-Gemischs im Vokaltrakt indem du annimmst dass der erzeugte Ton der Grundfrequenz der stehen Welle entspricht.
Solution:
SolQtyc*cfX*clX c f L cf cl c
Eine Person atmet Helium ein und spricht ein Vokal mit einer dominanten Resonanzfrequenz von cfO. Die Luftsäule im Vokaltrakt kann näherungsweise als zylindrische Röhre mit einer Länge von clO modelliert werden die am einen Ende durch die Stimmlippen geschlossen ist und am anderen Ende offen also wie eine gedackte Pfeife. Berechne die Schallgeschwindigkeit des Helium-Luft-Gemischs im Vokaltrakt indem du annimmst dass der erzeugte Ton der Grundfrequenz der stehen Welle entspricht.
Solution:
SolQtyc*cfX*clX c f L cf cl c
Meta Information
Exercise:
Eine Person atmet Helium ein und spricht ein Vokal mit einer dominanten Resonanzfrequenz von cfO. Die Luftsäule im Vokaltrakt kann näherungsweise als zylindrische Röhre mit einer Länge von clO modelliert werden die am einen Ende durch die Stimmlippen geschlossen ist und am anderen Ende offen also wie eine gedackte Pfeife. Berechne die Schallgeschwindigkeit des Helium-Luft-Gemischs im Vokaltrakt indem du annimmst dass der erzeugte Ton der Grundfrequenz der stehen Welle entspricht.
Solution:
SolQtyc*cfX*clX c f L cf cl c
Eine Person atmet Helium ein und spricht ein Vokal mit einer dominanten Resonanzfrequenz von cfO. Die Luftsäule im Vokaltrakt kann näherungsweise als zylindrische Röhre mit einer Länge von clO modelliert werden die am einen Ende durch die Stimmlippen geschlossen ist und am anderen Ende offen also wie eine gedackte Pfeife. Berechne die Schallgeschwindigkeit des Helium-Luft-Gemischs im Vokaltrakt indem du annimmst dass der erzeugte Ton der Grundfrequenz der stehen Welle entspricht.
Solution:
SolQtyc*cfX*clX c f L cf cl c
Contained in these collections
-
Frequenz von stehenden Wellen - einseitig by TeXercises
| Title | Matched on |
|---|---|
| Kompressibilität von Silikonöl | tags |
| Gespannte Saite | tags |
| Ultraschall in Rizinusöl | tags |
| Elastic waves in solid materials | tags |
| Lineare Massenbelegung von Saite | tags |
Physical Quantity
Geschwindigkeit \(v\)
Strecke pro Zeit
Veränderung des Ortes
Unit
Meter pro Sekunde (\(\rm \frac{m}{s}\))
Metric
Coherent
Similar exercises (11)
| Title | Matched on |
|---|---|
| Kompressibilität von Silikonöl | tags |
| Gespannte Saite | tags |
| Ultraschall in Rizinusöl | tags |
| Elastic waves in solid materials | tags |
| Lineare Massenbelegung von Saite | tags |
| Verhältnis von Schallgeschwindigkeit mittlerer Geschwindigkeit | tags |
| Wellenzahl von Stickstoff-Welle | tags |
| Wellengeschwindigkeit in Wasser | tags |
| Wellengeschwindigkeit | tags |
| Mit Argon gefüllte Röhre | tags |
| Kopfwelle eines Geschosses | tags |