Build an arch
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
Need help? Yes, please!
The following quantities appear in the problem:
Länge \(\ell\) / Kraft \(F\) / Drehmoment \(\vec M\) /
The following formulas must be used to solve the exercise:
\(\vec M = \vec \ell \times \vec F \quad \) \(\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k} \approx \ln(n) \quad \) \(\sum \stackrel{\curvearrowleft}{M} \stackrel{!}{=} \sum \stackrel{\curvearrowright}{M} \quad \)
No explanation / solution video for this exercise has yet been created.
But there is a video to a similar exercise:
In case your browser prevents YouTube embedding: https://youtu.be/84zexpVzw-M
But there is a video to a similar exercise:
Exercise:
Four bricks are to be stacked at the edge of a table each brick exts as far as possible beyond the edge of the table. abcliste abc To achieve this show that successive bricks mus ext no more than starting at the top frac fracfrac and frac of their length beyond the one below. abc Is the top brick completely beyond the base? abc Determine a general formula for the maximum total distance spanned by n bricks if they are to remain stable. abc A builder wants to construct a corbeled arch based on the principle of stability discussed in a and c above. What minium number of bricks each .m long is needed if the arch is to span .m? abcliste
Solution:
The solution of the four stapled bricks looks as in the following schematic picture indicated: center tikzpicturescale. filldrawcolorred!!black .-------.--.-.--cycle; filldrawcolorblack fillred!!yellow -----.---.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm filldrawcolorblack fillred!!yellow -----.---.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshiftcm pgftransformxshift-.cm filldrawcolorblack fillred!!yellow -----.---.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshiftcm filldrawcolorblack fillred!!yellow -----.---.--cycle; tikzpicture center abcliste abc The construction is stable if the vertical through the center of mass of all bricks together goes through the edge of the table. In the following drawings the red po indicates the center of mass. If there would be only one stone it could be placed in maximum like this i.e. half of its length beyond the tables edge: center tikzpicturexscale filldrawcolorblack fillblack! ---.----.-----cycle; draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; node at .-. fracL; filldrawcolorred fillred . circle .; tikzpicture center The next brick must support the brick above in its center of mass and the vertical through the center of mass of the two bricks together yet easy to imagine since the two-brick-body is fully symmetric see the red dashed line goes through the tables edge: center tikzpicturexscale drawdashed colorred --; filldrawcolorred fillred . circle .; filldrawcolorblack fillblack! ---.----.-----cycle; node at .-. fracL; pgftransformxshift-.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; node at .-. fracL; tikzpicture center As mentioned since the problem is yet fully symmetric it is obvious that the lower brick is one quarter off the edge of the table. The next brick can be placed under the other two such that it exts frac off the edge of the table: center tikzpicturexscale filldrawcolorred fillred . circle .; filldrawcolorblack fillblack! ---.----.-----cycle; node at .-. fracL; node at .. fracL; pgftransformxshift-.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; node at .-. fracL; tikzpicture center And the fourth brick can with similar arguments be placed frac over the edge of the table: center tikzpicturexscale filldrawcolorred fillred circle .; filldrawcolorblack fillblack! ---.----.-----cycle; node at .-. fracL; node at .. fracL; node at .. fracL; pgftransformxshift-.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; node at .-. fracL; tikzpicture center abc Yes the top-most brick is completely off the table since the distance tabledge to right-brick-edge of the top-most stone is as can be seen in the last graphics frac + frac + frac+frac frac. abc The total distance spanned by the arch built by n bricks is d fracL + fracL + fracL + fracL + dots fracL left+frac+frac+frac+dotsright fracL _k^n frack abc If the arch is to span pqm the number of bricks needed is fracpqmpq.m numpr. numpr. _k^n frack &approx ln n e^numpr. n . abcliste
Four bricks are to be stacked at the edge of a table each brick exts as far as possible beyond the edge of the table. abcliste abc To achieve this show that successive bricks mus ext no more than starting at the top frac fracfrac and frac of their length beyond the one below. abc Is the top brick completely beyond the base? abc Determine a general formula for the maximum total distance spanned by n bricks if they are to remain stable. abc A builder wants to construct a corbeled arch based on the principle of stability discussed in a and c above. What minium number of bricks each .m long is needed if the arch is to span .m? abcliste
Solution:
The solution of the four stapled bricks looks as in the following schematic picture indicated: center tikzpicturescale. filldrawcolorred!!black .-------.--.-.--cycle; filldrawcolorblack fillred!!yellow -----.---.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm filldrawcolorblack fillred!!yellow -----.---.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshiftcm pgftransformxshift-.cm filldrawcolorblack fillred!!yellow -----.---.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshiftcm filldrawcolorblack fillred!!yellow -----.---.--cycle; tikzpicture center abcliste abc The construction is stable if the vertical through the center of mass of all bricks together goes through the edge of the table. In the following drawings the red po indicates the center of mass. If there would be only one stone it could be placed in maximum like this i.e. half of its length beyond the tables edge: center tikzpicturexscale filldrawcolorblack fillblack! ---.----.-----cycle; draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; node at .-. fracL; filldrawcolorred fillred . circle .; tikzpicture center The next brick must support the brick above in its center of mass and the vertical through the center of mass of the two bricks together yet easy to imagine since the two-brick-body is fully symmetric see the red dashed line goes through the tables edge: center tikzpicturexscale drawdashed colorred --; filldrawcolorred fillred . circle .; filldrawcolorblack fillblack! ---.----.-----cycle; node at .-. fracL; pgftransformxshift-.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; node at .-. fracL; tikzpicture center As mentioned since the problem is yet fully symmetric it is obvious that the lower brick is one quarter off the edge of the table. The next brick can be placed under the other two such that it exts frac off the edge of the table: center tikzpicturexscale filldrawcolorred fillred . circle .; filldrawcolorblack fillblack! ---.----.-----cycle; node at .-. fracL; node at .. fracL; pgftransformxshift-.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; node at .-. fracL; tikzpicture center And the fourth brick can with similar arguments be placed frac over the edge of the table: center tikzpicturexscale filldrawcolorred fillred circle .; filldrawcolorblack fillblack! ---.----.-----cycle; node at .-. fracL; node at .. fracL; node at .. fracL; pgftransformxshift-.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; node at .-. fracL; tikzpicture center abc Yes the top-most brick is completely off the table since the distance tabledge to right-brick-edge of the top-most stone is as can be seen in the last graphics frac + frac + frac+frac frac. abc The total distance spanned by the arch built by n bricks is d fracL + fracL + fracL + fracL + dots fracL left+frac+frac+frac+dotsright fracL _k^n frack abc If the arch is to span pqm the number of bricks needed is fracpqmpq.m numpr. numpr. _k^n frack &approx ln n e^numpr. n . abcliste
Meta Information
Exercise:
Four bricks are to be stacked at the edge of a table each brick exts as far as possible beyond the edge of the table. abcliste abc To achieve this show that successive bricks mus ext no more than starting at the top frac fracfrac and frac of their length beyond the one below. abc Is the top brick completely beyond the base? abc Determine a general formula for the maximum total distance spanned by n bricks if they are to remain stable. abc A builder wants to construct a corbeled arch based on the principle of stability discussed in a and c above. What minium number of bricks each .m long is needed if the arch is to span .m? abcliste
Solution:
The solution of the four stapled bricks looks as in the following schematic picture indicated: center tikzpicturescale. filldrawcolorred!!black .-------.--.-.--cycle; filldrawcolorblack fillred!!yellow -----.---.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm filldrawcolorblack fillred!!yellow -----.---.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshiftcm pgftransformxshift-.cm filldrawcolorblack fillred!!yellow -----.---.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshiftcm filldrawcolorblack fillred!!yellow -----.---.--cycle; tikzpicture center abcliste abc The construction is stable if the vertical through the center of mass of all bricks together goes through the edge of the table. In the following drawings the red po indicates the center of mass. If there would be only one stone it could be placed in maximum like this i.e. half of its length beyond the tables edge: center tikzpicturexscale filldrawcolorblack fillblack! ---.----.-----cycle; draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; node at .-. fracL; filldrawcolorred fillred . circle .; tikzpicture center The next brick must support the brick above in its center of mass and the vertical through the center of mass of the two bricks together yet easy to imagine since the two-brick-body is fully symmetric see the red dashed line goes through the tables edge: center tikzpicturexscale drawdashed colorred --; filldrawcolorred fillred . circle .; filldrawcolorblack fillblack! ---.----.-----cycle; node at .-. fracL; pgftransformxshift-.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; node at .-. fracL; tikzpicture center As mentioned since the problem is yet fully symmetric it is obvious that the lower brick is one quarter off the edge of the table. The next brick can be placed under the other two such that it exts frac off the edge of the table: center tikzpicturexscale filldrawcolorred fillred . circle .; filldrawcolorblack fillblack! ---.----.-----cycle; node at .-. fracL; node at .. fracL; pgftransformxshift-.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; node at .-. fracL; tikzpicture center And the fourth brick can with similar arguments be placed frac over the edge of the table: center tikzpicturexscale filldrawcolorred fillred circle .; filldrawcolorblack fillblack! ---.----.-----cycle; node at .-. fracL; node at .. fracL; node at .. fracL; pgftransformxshift-.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; node at .-. fracL; tikzpicture center abc Yes the top-most brick is completely off the table since the distance tabledge to right-brick-edge of the top-most stone is as can be seen in the last graphics frac + frac + frac+frac frac. abc The total distance spanned by the arch built by n bricks is d fracL + fracL + fracL + fracL + dots fracL left+frac+frac+frac+dotsright fracL _k^n frack abc If the arch is to span pqm the number of bricks needed is fracpqmpq.m numpr. numpr. _k^n frack &approx ln n e^numpr. n . abcliste
Four bricks are to be stacked at the edge of a table each brick exts as far as possible beyond the edge of the table. abcliste abc To achieve this show that successive bricks mus ext no more than starting at the top frac fracfrac and frac of their length beyond the one below. abc Is the top brick completely beyond the base? abc Determine a general formula for the maximum total distance spanned by n bricks if they are to remain stable. abc A builder wants to construct a corbeled arch based on the principle of stability discussed in a and c above. What minium number of bricks each .m long is needed if the arch is to span .m? abcliste
Solution:
The solution of the four stapled bricks looks as in the following schematic picture indicated: center tikzpicturescale. filldrawcolorred!!black .-------.--.-.--cycle; filldrawcolorblack fillred!!yellow -----.---.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm filldrawcolorblack fillred!!yellow -----.---.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshiftcm pgftransformxshift-.cm filldrawcolorblack fillred!!yellow -----.---.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshiftcm filldrawcolorblack fillred!!yellow -----.---.--cycle; tikzpicture center abcliste abc The construction is stable if the vertical through the center of mass of all bricks together goes through the edge of the table. In the following drawings the red po indicates the center of mass. If there would be only one stone it could be placed in maximum like this i.e. half of its length beyond the tables edge: center tikzpicturexscale filldrawcolorblack fillblack! ---.----.-----cycle; draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; node at .-. fracL; filldrawcolorred fillred . circle .; tikzpicture center The next brick must support the brick above in its center of mass and the vertical through the center of mass of the two bricks together yet easy to imagine since the two-brick-body is fully symmetric see the red dashed line goes through the tables edge: center tikzpicturexscale drawdashed colorred --; filldrawcolorred fillred . circle .; filldrawcolorblack fillblack! ---.----.-----cycle; node at .-. fracL; pgftransformxshift-.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; node at .-. fracL; tikzpicture center As mentioned since the problem is yet fully symmetric it is obvious that the lower brick is one quarter off the edge of the table. The next brick can be placed under the other two such that it exts frac off the edge of the table: center tikzpicturexscale filldrawcolorred fillred . circle .; filldrawcolorblack fillblack! ---.----.-----cycle; node at .-. fracL; node at .. fracL; pgftransformxshift-.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; node at .-. fracL; tikzpicture center And the fourth brick can with similar arguments be placed frac over the edge of the table: center tikzpicturexscale filldrawcolorred fillred circle .; filldrawcolorblack fillblack! ---.----.-----cycle; node at .-. fracL; node at .. fracL; node at .. fracL; pgftransformxshift-.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; pgftransformyshift.cm pgftransformxshift.cm draw -.---..--..--.--cycle; node at .-. fracL; tikzpicture center abc Yes the top-most brick is completely off the table since the distance tabledge to right-brick-edge of the top-most stone is as can be seen in the last graphics frac + frac + frac+frac frac. abc The total distance spanned by the arch built by n bricks is d fracL + fracL + fracL + fracL + dots fracL left+frac+frac+frac+dotsright fracL _k^n frack abc If the arch is to span pqm the number of bricks needed is fracpqmpq.m numpr. numpr. _k^n frack &approx ln n e^numpr. n . abcliste
Contained in these collections:
-
Torbogen by TeXercises