Schmelzwärme von Nickel
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
Need help? Yes, please!
The following quantities appear in the problem:
Masse \(m\) / Energie \(E\) / Wärme \(Q\) / Heizwert \(H\) / spezifische latente Wärme \(L\) /
The following formulas must be used to solve the exercise:
\(E = m \cdot H \quad \) \(Q = m \cdot L_{\scriptscriptstyle\rm f} \quad \)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Durch die Verbrennung von mO Olivenöl HO Heizwert könnte man im besten Fall mNiO Nickel fest beim Schmelzpunkt vorlieg verflüssigen. Welche spezifische Schmelzwärme errechnet man daraus für Nickel?
Solution:
Geg m_ mO m H HO H m_ mNiO mNi Gesspezifische SchmelzwärmeLsiJpkg Durch das Verbrennen des Olivenöls werden Q m_H m H Q WärmEnergie freigesetzt womit die spezifische Schmelzwärme von Nickel ungefähr L fracQm_ fracm_Hm_ fracQmNi L approx LS beträgt. L fracm_Hm_ LS
Durch die Verbrennung von mO Olivenöl HO Heizwert könnte man im besten Fall mNiO Nickel fest beim Schmelzpunkt vorlieg verflüssigen. Welche spezifische Schmelzwärme errechnet man daraus für Nickel?
Solution:
Geg m_ mO m H HO H m_ mNiO mNi Gesspezifische SchmelzwärmeLsiJpkg Durch das Verbrennen des Olivenöls werden Q m_H m H Q WärmEnergie freigesetzt womit die spezifische Schmelzwärme von Nickel ungefähr L fracQm_ fracm_Hm_ fracQmNi L approx LS beträgt. L fracm_Hm_ LS
Meta Information
Exercise:
Durch die Verbrennung von mO Olivenöl HO Heizwert könnte man im besten Fall mNiO Nickel fest beim Schmelzpunkt vorlieg verflüssigen. Welche spezifische Schmelzwärme errechnet man daraus für Nickel?
Solution:
Geg m_ mO m H HO H m_ mNiO mNi Gesspezifische SchmelzwärmeLsiJpkg Durch das Verbrennen des Olivenöls werden Q m_H m H Q WärmEnergie freigesetzt womit die spezifische Schmelzwärme von Nickel ungefähr L fracQm_ fracm_Hm_ fracQmNi L approx LS beträgt. L fracm_Hm_ LS
Durch die Verbrennung von mO Olivenöl HO Heizwert könnte man im besten Fall mNiO Nickel fest beim Schmelzpunkt vorlieg verflüssigen. Welche spezifische Schmelzwärme errechnet man daraus für Nickel?
Solution:
Geg m_ mO m H HO H m_ mNiO mNi Gesspezifische SchmelzwärmeLsiJpkg Durch das Verbrennen des Olivenöls werden Q m_H m H Q WärmEnergie freigesetzt womit die spezifische Schmelzwärme von Nickel ungefähr L fracQm_ fracm_Hm_ fracQmNi L approx LS beträgt. L fracm_Hm_ LS
Contained in these collections
-
Schmelzwärme und Heizwert by TeXercises
| Title | Matched on |
|---|---|
| Heizwert von Stoff | tagsformula |
| Déchets en Suisse en 2012 | formula |
| Biorender AG | formula |
| Mit Brennholz Eisen schmelzen | tagsformula |
| Wasser mit Heizöl erhitzen | formula |
Physical Quantity
Heizwert \(H\)
Loading Wikipedia summary…
Verbrennung eines Stoffes liefert so viel nutzbare Energie
Unit
Joule pro Kilogramm (\(\rm \frac{J}{kg}\))
Metric
Coherent
Similar exercises (11)
| Title | Matched on |
|---|---|
| Heizwert von Stoff | tagsformula |
| Déchets en Suisse en 2012 | formula |
| Biorender AG | formula |
| Mit Brennholz Eisen schmelzen | tagsformula |
| Wasser mit Heizöl erhitzen | formula |
| Mit Kohle kochen | formula |
| Wasser mit Heizöl erhitzen | formula |
| Heating water with diesel | formula |
| Kupfer mit Buchenholz schmelzen | tagsformula |
| Kosten um Eisen zu schmelzen | formula |
| Verbrennungsmotor | formula |