Two Masses with a Spring
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Two masses M and m are coupled through a spring with elastic constant k see figure. center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:two-masses-with-spring-# center The differential s for this system are M ddot x_ kx_-x_ m ddot x_ kx_-x_ abcliste abc Derive formal expressions for the frequencies of the normal modes of the system. abc Ase that Mm. Make an educated guess for the eigenvectors describing the normal modes and verify your prediction with a calculation. abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The coefficient matrix is bf A pmatrix -frackM & frackM frackm & -frackm pmatrix pmatrix -omega_s^ & omega_s^ omega_f^ & -omega_f^ pmatrix with omega_s^ frackM quad textrmslow mode omega_f^ frackm quad textrmfast mode With the trace and determinant being tau -omega_s^-omega_f^ Delta omega_s^omega_f^-omega_s^omega_f^ we find for the eigenvalues lambda_ frac-omega_s^+omega_f^pm omega_s^+omega_f^ Longrightarrow lambda_ lambda_ -omega_s^+omega_f^ The corresponding angular frequencies are omega_ omega_ sqrtomega_s^+omega_f^ sqrtfrackM+frackm sqrtfrackm+MMm abc The first normal mode omega_ corresponds to a uniform translation. The eigenvector is expected to be vec v_ pmatrix pmatrix This can easily be verified: bf Avec v_ pmatrix -omega_s^ & omega_s^ omega_f^ & -omega_f^ pmatrix pmatrix pmatrix pmatrix -omega_s^+omega_s^ omega_f^-omega_f^ pmatrix pmatrix pmatrix vec v_ The second normal mode corresponds to a vibration about the centre of mass. The amplitude of the lighter mass has to be twice as large for the centre of mass to remain in place. For Mm we have omega_f^omega_s^ and the eigenvalue is lambda_ -omega_s^+omega_f^-omega_s^ We expect an eigenvector vec v_ pmatrix - pmatrix To verify the eigenvector we have to calculate bf Avec v_ pmatrix -omega_s^ & omega_s^ omega_f^ & -omega_f^ pmatrix pmatrix - pmatrix omega_s^ pmatrix - & & - pmatrix pmatrix - pmatrix omega_s^ pmatrix - - + pmatrix omega_s^ pmatrix - pmatrix - omega_s^ pmatrix - pmatrix lambda_ vec v_ as expected. abcliste
Two masses M and m are coupled through a spring with elastic constant k see figure. center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:two-masses-with-spring-# center The differential s for this system are M ddot x_ kx_-x_ m ddot x_ kx_-x_ abcliste abc Derive formal expressions for the frequencies of the normal modes of the system. abc Ase that Mm. Make an educated guess for the eigenvectors describing the normal modes and verify your prediction with a calculation. abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The coefficient matrix is bf A pmatrix -frackM & frackM frackm & -frackm pmatrix pmatrix -omega_s^ & omega_s^ omega_f^ & -omega_f^ pmatrix with omega_s^ frackM quad textrmslow mode omega_f^ frackm quad textrmfast mode With the trace and determinant being tau -omega_s^-omega_f^ Delta omega_s^omega_f^-omega_s^omega_f^ we find for the eigenvalues lambda_ frac-omega_s^+omega_f^pm omega_s^+omega_f^ Longrightarrow lambda_ lambda_ -omega_s^+omega_f^ The corresponding angular frequencies are omega_ omega_ sqrtomega_s^+omega_f^ sqrtfrackM+frackm sqrtfrackm+MMm abc The first normal mode omega_ corresponds to a uniform translation. The eigenvector is expected to be vec v_ pmatrix pmatrix This can easily be verified: bf Avec v_ pmatrix -omega_s^ & omega_s^ omega_f^ & -omega_f^ pmatrix pmatrix pmatrix pmatrix -omega_s^+omega_s^ omega_f^-omega_f^ pmatrix pmatrix pmatrix vec v_ The second normal mode corresponds to a vibration about the centre of mass. The amplitude of the lighter mass has to be twice as large for the centre of mass to remain in place. For Mm we have omega_f^omega_s^ and the eigenvalue is lambda_ -omega_s^+omega_f^-omega_s^ We expect an eigenvector vec v_ pmatrix - pmatrix To verify the eigenvector we have to calculate bf Avec v_ pmatrix -omega_s^ & omega_s^ omega_f^ & -omega_f^ pmatrix pmatrix - pmatrix omega_s^ pmatrix - & & - pmatrix pmatrix - pmatrix omega_s^ pmatrix - - + pmatrix omega_s^ pmatrix - pmatrix - omega_s^ pmatrix - pmatrix lambda_ vec v_ as expected. abcliste
Meta Information
Exercise:
Two masses M and m are coupled through a spring with elastic constant k see figure. center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:two-masses-with-spring-# center The differential s for this system are M ddot x_ kx_-x_ m ddot x_ kx_-x_ abcliste abc Derive formal expressions for the frequencies of the normal modes of the system. abc Ase that Mm. Make an educated guess for the eigenvectors describing the normal modes and verify your prediction with a calculation. abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The coefficient matrix is bf A pmatrix -frackM & frackM frackm & -frackm pmatrix pmatrix -omega_s^ & omega_s^ omega_f^ & -omega_f^ pmatrix with omega_s^ frackM quad textrmslow mode omega_f^ frackm quad textrmfast mode With the trace and determinant being tau -omega_s^-omega_f^ Delta omega_s^omega_f^-omega_s^omega_f^ we find for the eigenvalues lambda_ frac-omega_s^+omega_f^pm omega_s^+omega_f^ Longrightarrow lambda_ lambda_ -omega_s^+omega_f^ The corresponding angular frequencies are omega_ omega_ sqrtomega_s^+omega_f^ sqrtfrackM+frackm sqrtfrackm+MMm abc The first normal mode omega_ corresponds to a uniform translation. The eigenvector is expected to be vec v_ pmatrix pmatrix This can easily be verified: bf Avec v_ pmatrix -omega_s^ & omega_s^ omega_f^ & -omega_f^ pmatrix pmatrix pmatrix pmatrix -omega_s^+omega_s^ omega_f^-omega_f^ pmatrix pmatrix pmatrix vec v_ The second normal mode corresponds to a vibration about the centre of mass. The amplitude of the lighter mass has to be twice as large for the centre of mass to remain in place. For Mm we have omega_f^omega_s^ and the eigenvalue is lambda_ -omega_s^+omega_f^-omega_s^ We expect an eigenvector vec v_ pmatrix - pmatrix To verify the eigenvector we have to calculate bf Avec v_ pmatrix -omega_s^ & omega_s^ omega_f^ & -omega_f^ pmatrix pmatrix - pmatrix omega_s^ pmatrix - & & - pmatrix pmatrix - pmatrix omega_s^ pmatrix - - + pmatrix omega_s^ pmatrix - pmatrix - omega_s^ pmatrix - pmatrix lambda_ vec v_ as expected. abcliste
Two masses M and m are coupled through a spring with elastic constant k see figure. center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:two-masses-with-spring-# center The differential s for this system are M ddot x_ kx_-x_ m ddot x_ kx_-x_ abcliste abc Derive formal expressions for the frequencies of the normal modes of the system. abc Ase that Mm. Make an educated guess for the eigenvectors describing the normal modes and verify your prediction with a calculation. abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The coefficient matrix is bf A pmatrix -frackM & frackM frackm & -frackm pmatrix pmatrix -omega_s^ & omega_s^ omega_f^ & -omega_f^ pmatrix with omega_s^ frackM quad textrmslow mode omega_f^ frackm quad textrmfast mode With the trace and determinant being tau -omega_s^-omega_f^ Delta omega_s^omega_f^-omega_s^omega_f^ we find for the eigenvalues lambda_ frac-omega_s^+omega_f^pm omega_s^+omega_f^ Longrightarrow lambda_ lambda_ -omega_s^+omega_f^ The corresponding angular frequencies are omega_ omega_ sqrtomega_s^+omega_f^ sqrtfrackM+frackm sqrtfrackm+MMm abc The first normal mode omega_ corresponds to a uniform translation. The eigenvector is expected to be vec v_ pmatrix pmatrix This can easily be verified: bf Avec v_ pmatrix -omega_s^ & omega_s^ omega_f^ & -omega_f^ pmatrix pmatrix pmatrix pmatrix -omega_s^+omega_s^ omega_f^-omega_f^ pmatrix pmatrix pmatrix vec v_ The second normal mode corresponds to a vibration about the centre of mass. The amplitude of the lighter mass has to be twice as large for the centre of mass to remain in place. For Mm we have omega_f^omega_s^ and the eigenvalue is lambda_ -omega_s^+omega_f^-omega_s^ We expect an eigenvector vec v_ pmatrix - pmatrix To verify the eigenvector we have to calculate bf Avec v_ pmatrix -omega_s^ & omega_s^ omega_f^ & -omega_f^ pmatrix pmatrix - pmatrix omega_s^ pmatrix - & & - pmatrix pmatrix - pmatrix omega_s^ pmatrix - - + pmatrix omega_s^ pmatrix - pmatrix - omega_s^ pmatrix - pmatrix lambda_ vec v_ as expected. abcliste
Contained in these collections:

