Medical test with Technetium
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
A patient mO is to be given a medical test involving the ingestion of isotopeTc which decays by emitting upgamma-rays of EeO energy. The half-life for this decay is TO. Asing that about half the gamma photons exit the body without eracting with anything what must be the initial activity of the Technetium sample if the wholbody dose cannot exceed HO? Make the rough approximation that biological elimination of Tc can be ignored.
Solution:
Geg m mO m upgamma rightarrow w q E_ EeO Ee T TO T H HO H GesActivityAsiBq An equivalent dose of HO of upgamma-rays with quality factor qqO equals D fracHw fracHq D. energy dose. A person with mO mass therefore can absorb E m D m fracHw fracmHw m D E in total energy before reaching the limit of HO. Since one upgamma-ray disposes EeO in the body a maximum of tilde N fracEE_ fracfracmHwE_ fracmHwE_ fracEEe Na upgamma-rays should be absorbed. Because only half of the emitted rays eract with the body the sample size must be restricted to only emit N tilde N fracmHwE_ Na N of upgamma-rays. A Technetium sample with this total amount of isotopes has A lambda N fracln T N fracln T fracmHwE_ lam N A activity. A frac ln mHwE_T fracln mHwE_T A
A patient mO is to be given a medical test involving the ingestion of isotopeTc which decays by emitting upgamma-rays of EeO energy. The half-life for this decay is TO. Asing that about half the gamma photons exit the body without eracting with anything what must be the initial activity of the Technetium sample if the wholbody dose cannot exceed HO? Make the rough approximation that biological elimination of Tc can be ignored.
Solution:
Geg m mO m upgamma rightarrow w q E_ EeO Ee T TO T H HO H GesActivityAsiBq An equivalent dose of HO of upgamma-rays with quality factor qqO equals D fracHw fracHq D. energy dose. A person with mO mass therefore can absorb E m D m fracHw fracmHw m D E in total energy before reaching the limit of HO. Since one upgamma-ray disposes EeO in the body a maximum of tilde N fracEE_ fracfracmHwE_ fracmHwE_ fracEEe Na upgamma-rays should be absorbed. Because only half of the emitted rays eract with the body the sample size must be restricted to only emit N tilde N fracmHwE_ Na N of upgamma-rays. A Technetium sample with this total amount of isotopes has A lambda N fracln T N fracln T fracmHwE_ lam N A activity. A frac ln mHwE_T fracln mHwE_T A
Meta Information
Exercise:
A patient mO is to be given a medical test involving the ingestion of isotopeTc which decays by emitting upgamma-rays of EeO energy. The half-life for this decay is TO. Asing that about half the gamma photons exit the body without eracting with anything what must be the initial activity of the Technetium sample if the wholbody dose cannot exceed HO? Make the rough approximation that biological elimination of Tc can be ignored.
Solution:
Geg m mO m upgamma rightarrow w q E_ EeO Ee T TO T H HO H GesActivityAsiBq An equivalent dose of HO of upgamma-rays with quality factor qqO equals D fracHw fracHq D. energy dose. A person with mO mass therefore can absorb E m D m fracHw fracmHw m D E in total energy before reaching the limit of HO. Since one upgamma-ray disposes EeO in the body a maximum of tilde N fracEE_ fracfracmHwE_ fracmHwE_ fracEEe Na upgamma-rays should be absorbed. Because only half of the emitted rays eract with the body the sample size must be restricted to only emit N tilde N fracmHwE_ Na N of upgamma-rays. A Technetium sample with this total amount of isotopes has A lambda N fracln T N fracln T fracmHwE_ lam N A activity. A frac ln mHwE_T fracln mHwE_T A
A patient mO is to be given a medical test involving the ingestion of isotopeTc which decays by emitting upgamma-rays of EeO energy. The half-life for this decay is TO. Asing that about half the gamma photons exit the body without eracting with anything what must be the initial activity of the Technetium sample if the wholbody dose cannot exceed HO? Make the rough approximation that biological elimination of Tc can be ignored.
Solution:
Geg m mO m upgamma rightarrow w q E_ EeO Ee T TO T H HO H GesActivityAsiBq An equivalent dose of HO of upgamma-rays with quality factor qqO equals D fracHw fracHq D. energy dose. A person with mO mass therefore can absorb E m D m fracHw fracmHw m D E in total energy before reaching the limit of HO. Since one upgamma-ray disposes EeO in the body a maximum of tilde N fracEE_ fracfracmHwE_ fracmHwE_ fracEEe Na upgamma-rays should be absorbed. Because only half of the emitted rays eract with the body the sample size must be restricted to only emit N tilde N fracmHwE_ Na N of upgamma-rays. A Technetium sample with this total amount of isotopes has A lambda N fracln T N fracln T fracmHwE_ lam N A activity. A frac ln mHwE_T fracln mHwE_T A
Contained in these collections:
-
Dosimetrie II by pw
-
Dosimetrie 1 by uz
-
Dosimetrie by aej
Asked Quantity:
Aktivität \(A\)
in
Becquerel \(\rm Bq\)
Physical Quantity
Aktivität \(A\)
Anzahl Kernzerfälle pro Zeit
\( A = \dfrac{\Delta N}{\Delta t}\)
Unit
Becquerel (\(\rm Bq\))
Base?
SI?
Metric?
Coherent?
Imperial?
\(\rm25\,MBq\): Kilogramm Uran
\(\rm10\,kBq\): menschlicher Körper
\(\rm15\,Bq\): Kubikmeter Luft
\(\rm100\,Bq\): Kilogramm Nahrungsmittel