Körper in Wasser und in Luft
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
Need help? Yes, please!
The following quantities appear in the problem:
The following formulas must be used to solve the exercise:
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Ein Körper ist in Luft FlO in vollständig in reines Wasser eingetaucht ist er noch FwO schwer. Welches Volumen hat der Körper?
Solution:
Geg sscFG FlO sscFG' FwO GesVolumenVsicubicmeter Der Körper erfährt im Wassesr sscFA sscFG- sscFG' Fl - Fw FA Auftriebskraft. Er hat also V fracsscFArho g fracsscFG- sscFG'rho g fracFAr ncg V approx VS Volumen. V fracsscFG- sscFG'rho g VS
Ein Körper ist in Luft FlO in vollständig in reines Wasser eingetaucht ist er noch FwO schwer. Welches Volumen hat der Körper?
Solution:
Geg sscFG FlO sscFG' FwO GesVolumenVsicubicmeter Der Körper erfährt im Wassesr sscFA sscFG- sscFG' Fl - Fw FA Auftriebskraft. Er hat also V fracsscFArho g fracsscFG- sscFG'rho g fracFAr ncg V approx VS Volumen. V fracsscFG- sscFG'rho g VS
Meta Information
Exercise:
Ein Körper ist in Luft FlO in vollständig in reines Wasser eingetaucht ist er noch FwO schwer. Welches Volumen hat der Körper?
Solution:
Geg sscFG FlO sscFG' FwO GesVolumenVsicubicmeter Der Körper erfährt im Wassesr sscFA sscFG- sscFG' Fl - Fw FA Auftriebskraft. Er hat also V fracsscFArho g fracsscFG- sscFG'rho g fracFAr ncg V approx VS Volumen. V fracsscFG- sscFG'rho g VS
Ein Körper ist in Luft FlO in vollständig in reines Wasser eingetaucht ist er noch FwO schwer. Welches Volumen hat der Körper?
Solution:
Geg sscFG FlO sscFG' FwO GesVolumenVsicubicmeter Der Körper erfährt im Wassesr sscFA sscFG- sscFG' Fl - Fw FA Auftriebskraft. Er hat also V fracsscFArho g fracsscFG- sscFG'rho g fracFAr ncg V approx VS Volumen. V fracsscFG- sscFG'rho g VS
Contained in these collections
-
Körper in Wasser und in Luft by TeXercises
| Title | Creator | Matched on |
|---|---|---|
| Corps dans l’eau et dans l’air | uz | tagsformula |
| Eintauchtiefe von Standup Paddle Board | uz | tagsformula |
| Öltank im Keller | uz | tags |
| Quader aus Buchenholz | uz | tags |
| Auftrieb in Quecksilber | uz | tags |
Physical Quantity
Volumen \(V\)
Loading Wikipedia summary…
Rauminhalt
Unit
Kubikmeter (\(\rm m^3\))
Metric
Coherent
Similar exercises (24)
| Title | Creator | Matched on |
|---|---|---|
| Corps dans l’eau et dans l’air | uz | tagsformula |
| Eintauchtiefe von Standup Paddle Board | uz | tagsformula |
| Öltank im Keller | uz | tags |
| Quader aus Buchenholz | uz | tags |
| Auftrieb in Quecksilber | uz | tags |
| Aluwürfel in Quecksilber | uz | tags |
| Aluwürfel in Quecksilber | sn | tags |
| Kork im See | uz | tags |
| Frachtschiff im Meerwasser | uz | tags |
| Holzwürfel ins Wassergefäss | uz | tags |
| Scheinbare Gewichtskraft | uz | tags |
| Zwei Gläser | uz | tags |
| Spitze des Eisbergs | uz | tags |
| Floss aus Balsaholz | uz | tags |
| Kork und Kupfer | uz | tags |
| Reagenzglas | uz | tags |
| Floss aus Balsaholz | uz | tags |
| Eisberge | uz | tags |
| Auftrieb | uz | tags |
| Fläche einer Eisscholle mit Mann drauf | sn | tags |
| Fläche einer Eisscholle mit Mann drauf | uz | tags |
| Surface of an ice floe with a man on it | uz | tags |
| Quader aus Buchenholz | sn | tags |
| Messing im Öl | uz | tags |

