Zwei neue Planeten
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
Need help? Yes, please!
The following quantities appear in the problem:
Masse \(m\) / Kraft \(F\) / Strecke \(s\) / Drehmoment \(\vec M\) / Radius \(r\) / Umlaufzeit \(T\) / Winkelgeschwindigkeit / Kreisfrequenz \(\omega\) /
The following formulas must be used to solve the exercise:
\(\frac{T^2}{r^3} = \frac{4\pi^2}{GM} \quad \) \(F = G \dfrac{m_1m_2}{r^2} \quad \) \(\sum \stackrel{\curvearrowleft}{M} \stackrel{!}{=} \sum \stackrel{\curvearrowright}{M} \quad \) \(\vec r_{\rm S} = \frac{1}{M} \sum_i m_i \vec r_i \quad \) \(F = mr\omega^2 \quad \)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Zwei Planeten P_ und P_ Kreisen um die gleiche Sonne. Der Abstand von P_ sei AE und von P_ AE. In welchem Verhältnis stehen ihre Umlaufszeiten?
Solution:
Mit dem . Kepler Gesetz erhalten wir direkt dass: fracT_^T_^ fraca_^a_^ myRarrow fracT_T_ sqrtfraca_^a_^ apx frac..
Zwei Planeten P_ und P_ Kreisen um die gleiche Sonne. Der Abstand von P_ sei AE und von P_ AE. In welchem Verhältnis stehen ihre Umlaufszeiten?
Solution:
Mit dem . Kepler Gesetz erhalten wir direkt dass: fracT_^T_^ fraca_^a_^ myRarrow fracT_T_ sqrtfraca_^a_^ apx frac..
Meta Information
Exercise:
Zwei Planeten P_ und P_ Kreisen um die gleiche Sonne. Der Abstand von P_ sei AE und von P_ AE. In welchem Verhältnis stehen ihre Umlaufszeiten?
Solution:
Mit dem . Kepler Gesetz erhalten wir direkt dass: fracT_^T_^ fraca_^a_^ myRarrow fracT_T_ sqrtfraca_^a_^ apx frac..
Zwei Planeten P_ und P_ Kreisen um die gleiche Sonne. Der Abstand von P_ sei AE und von P_ AE. In welchem Verhältnis stehen ihre Umlaufszeiten?
Solution:
Mit dem . Kepler Gesetz erhalten wir direkt dass: fracT_^T_^ fraca_^a_^ myRarrow fracT_T_ sqrtfraca_^a_^ apx frac..
Contained in these collections
-
Doppelstern by TeXercises
| Title | Matched on |
|---|---|
| Mein Vater erklärt | tags |
| Komet Halley | tags |
| Neptun flieg! | tags |
| Asteroid | tags |
| Neuer Planet | tags |
Similar exercises (31)
| Title | Matched on |
|---|---|
| Mein Vater erklärt | tags |
| Komet Halley | tags |
| Neptun flieg! | tags |
| Asteroid | tags |
| Neuer Planet | tags |
| Neuer Planet (gekürzt) | tags |
| Zwillinge im Weltall | tags |
| Epizykeltheorie | tags |
| Astro und mehr. | tags |
| Schneller Satellit | tags |
| Champ-Projekt | tags |
| Weltbilder | tags |
| Schwerelos | tags |
| Gravitationsbeschleunigung | tags |
| Jupitermond Io | tags |
| Sternmasse | tags |
| Neutronenstern | tags |
| Plums Pluto | tags |
| CMB | tags |
| Herleitung Kepler III | tags |
| Planet mit Loch | tags |
| Unsichtbare Planeten | tags |
| Zwei Tanker | tags |
| Bergsteigen | tags |
| Mount Everest | tags |
| 5 gegen 1 | tags |
| Perihel und Aphel | tags |
| Schwarzes Loch | tags |
| Entsorgung von Weltallschrott | tags |
| Spring Armstrong spring! | tags |
| Planeten entdeckt! | tags |